Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 07/05/2019 in all areas

  1. 101 points
  2. 71 points
    Let me first say that I am sorry this took me so long. Since 2004 this forum has had rules in place that prohibits the discussion of race. I’ve been trying to find a way to make a statement that fits within the boundaries of the rules and still conveys what I think needs to be said. It’s been impossible and so I now will purposely break the forum rules. Some will see me as a hypocrite. Some may say I’ve waited too long and it doesn’t matter what I say. I don’t care. If this makes a difference and helps change one persons mind it was worth it. So I will now add my small voice to say I support the equal treatment and equal justice for everyone regardless of color, creed or sexual orientation. I support the peaceful protests going on to help black lives in America. Everyone needs to work to make a change in any way they can. Protest peacefully. Contact your local representatives in government and make your voice heard. Most importantly…. Vote! Support candidates who will make a difference. Vote in every election. VOTE! VOTE! VOTE! If you are over 18 and not registered to vote, do so today! Go to vote.gov for more information. The forum will go offline for 8 hours tomorrow morning as a small sign of support. When the forum returns we will move forward as a community with the same rules and restrictions in place. Our forum’s rules aren’t going to change. We don’t allow political discussion on this forum because it is far too polarizing and will cause conflicts and resentments that will destroy the community. Politics and everything going on in the world is a lot more important than football and what we focus on at FootballsFuture.com, but that doesn’t mean we should discuss these things here. In fact, many members need a politics free zone now more than ever. Most media outlets use political divide to boost ratings. Almost every social media site is nothing but political talk. This site will remain politics free. This statement will remain on the site, but it is not up for discussion. Do not quote me. Do not discuss it in other topics. Feel free to contact me via PM with any comments, questions, or feedback.
  3. 65 points
    or............you could have just had DeAndre Hopkins
  4. 49 points
    He’s been needing a promotion for a while now. Good for him. He should hire a HC first and foremost.
  5. 47 points
    Classic example of why you should always submit a resume even when you don't meet all the job requirements.
  6. 45 points
    I forgot that our site is football's past.
  7. 43 points
    San Diego will be re-zoning the school districts to compensate for the move shortly.
  8. 41 points
    Clearly their 2-2 record and 4 games into Jones's and Haskins's rookie season is the appropriate time for Gettlemen to flex on all the haters.
  9. 40 points
  10. 39 points
    it's gotta be for Lamar Jackson. With Gurley's knee, the Rams need a good RB.
  11. 38 points
    Hi guys Bringing this back again this year, the DMs were stacking up with guys begging for it and I couldn't let fans of my work down. Therefore I have begun work on this year's ranks, so please feel free to tune in and cheer on your team's ranking as they appear. As usual, these will appear from worst to best as the write-ups have been finished. There's absolutely no doubt in my mind fans of teams will agree with all of my criticisms, especially the very negative ones. Previous threads:- 2019: - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/18845-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2019-cardinals-at-1/ 2018:- https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/10240-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2018-tampa-bay-at-1/ Ranks: 1. Denver Broncos - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-3-up/?do=findComment&comment=2887420 2. Baltimore Ravens - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-3-up/?do=findComment&comment=2887415 3. Dallas Cowboys - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-4-up/?do=findComment&comment=2886514 4. Carolina Panthers - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-5-up/?do=findComment&comment=2885598 5. Jacksonville Jaguars - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-bengals-at-6/?do=findComment&comment=2885190 6. Cincinnati Bengals - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-minnesota-at-7/?do=findComment&comment=2885184 7. Minnesota Vikings - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-8-up/?do=findComment&comment=2883598 8. Miami Dolphins - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-9-up/?do=findComment&comment=2882990 9. New York Jets - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-browns-at-10/?do=findComment&comment=2881797 10. Cleveland Browns - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-11-up/?do=findComment&comment=2881044 11. Detroit Lions - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-cardinals-at-12/?do=findComment&comment=2880737 12. Arizona Cardinals - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-raiders-at-13/?do=findComment&comment=2879971 13. Las Vegas Raiders - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-14-up/?do=findComment&comment=2878941 14. New York Giants - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-16-up/?do=findComment&comment=2878448 15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-raiders-at-13/?do=findComment&comment=2878442 16. Buffalo Bills - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-17-up/?do=findComment&comment=2877432 17. Kansas City Chiefs - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-18-up/?do=findComment&comment=2877047 18. Indianapolis Colts - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-19-up/?do=findComment&comment=2876823 19. Philadelphia Eagles - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-20-up/?do=findComment&comment=2876811 20. Los Angeles Chargers - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-21-up/?do=findComment&comment=2875935 21. Washington Redskins - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-22-up/?do=findComment&comment=2875521 22. Los Angeles Rams - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-23-up/?do=findComment&comment=2875409 23. San Francisco 49ers - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-24-up/?do=findComment&comment=2875403 24. Atlanta Falcons - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-25-up/?do=findComment&comment=2874545 25. New Orleans Saints - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-26-up/?do=findComment&comment=2873803 26. New England Patriots - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-27-up/?do=findComment&comment=2873552 27. Tennessee Titans - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-28-up/?do=findComment&comment=2872685 28. Pittsburgh Steelers - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-29-up/?do=findComment&comment=2871785 29. Seattle Seahawks - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-30-up/?do=findComment&comment=2871446 30. Chicago Bears - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-31-up/?do=findComment&comment=2871384 31. Green Bay Packers - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020-32-up/?do=findComment&comment=2869530 32. Houston Texans - https://forums.footballsfuture.com/topic/27916-goldfishs-way-too-early-draft-rankings-2020/?do=findComment&comment=2869211
  12. 36 points
    No wonder the Rams went budget on their uniforms.
  13. 36 points
  14. 34 points
    Imagine being a billionaire and being like “Lose some money, give up my 4th house? Lol Let’s just take money from the people who worked their entire life for like a 3-5 year peak employment window”
  15. 34 points
    How isnt Cleveland an option? They’ve been waiting more than two decades.
  16. 32 points
  17. 32 points
  18. 32 points
    On a serious note, I can say there was no happy ending for Robert Kraft this time.
  19. 32 points
    Also thoughts and prayers to the real victims here: the guys who drafted Luck in fantasy football.
  20. 31 points
  21. 31 points
    I just think that you better be really freaking sure about the guy you are hiring to replace him because for all his flaws, Andy is a heck of a good coach, and what he does is not easily replaced by some schlub off the streets.
  22. 31 points
    Marcus Mariota sucks. That’s a fact.
  23. 29 points
  24. 29 points
    A few members have mentioned they are running out of footballs (likes)... I have decided to double the amount of footballs you can hand out each day of the draft and through the weekend. Everyone enjoy!
  25. 29 points
    Vikes got a first for Diggs and the Texans cant get a first for Hopkins.....SMH
  26. 29 points
    I'm here for the @ET80 meltdown.
  27. 29 points
    One might say Devonta is a free man.
  28. 29 points
  29. 29 points
    Benching him in the first place was stupid as hell.
  30. 28 points
    With the Pats dynasty dead, he can rest now.
  31. 27 points
  32. 27 points
    This is my 1000th post. The fact that it has taken me over 15 years to get to a 1000 posts, shows you I am a man of few words. I didn't plan it, but I think it's appropriate that I hit 1000 posts during the 2020 draft. Football's Future is over 20 years old. It all started in 1999 with a mock draft. The forum was created in October 2004 and that is when the site really took off. Many of you have been members of this community for most of that time. Thank you all so much for your support over the years. Football's Future would be nothing without you.
  33. 26 points
    The short answer is your twitter friend is a dunce, and either doesn't know what he's talking about, just wants to sound smarter than he is, or all of the above. In today's NFL, RB and HB are essentially synonymous (along with "tailback"). Way back in old-timey football, there was the quarterback, the halfback (actually usually two), and the fullback. The QB lined up just under center, the halfback behind him (halfway back), and the full back in the rear (fully back). If there were two HBs on the field they'd be side by side (common in the early part of the century). Every player was a legitimate threat to run: QB, HBs, FB. Over time as the game evolved, the roles shifted around, the fullback typically lined up just behind the QB, as a lead blocker, and the HB went in back, but the names just never changed. In the modern I-formation, with the HB in back, that's also why you hear tailback sometimes. They're all RBs technically, but again, in common parlance RB refers to the HB. Which brings us back to the start: This Twitter person is just spewing garb-o in an attempt to sound smart.
  34. 26 points
    Same, which is why I said he'll obviously be fine but giving up 40 million is still giving up 40 million.
  35. 26 points
    If I made 40 million last year, I also wouldn't need 40 million this year.
  36. 26 points
    Holy freaking hell, make it stop...
  37. 26 points
  38. 25 points
    This took me entirely too long but I think it's funny...
  39. 25 points
  40. 25 points
    It's a bit early to say that he's a #1 overall pick, but he's thriving in a system that has its roots in the Gulf Coast Offense. I don't think anybody who watched Burrow last year thought he lacked the size, athleticism, or arm strength to be a NFL QB. However, he was a first-year starter playing in an archaic offense. Even then, he wasn't awful. He showed promise. In a modernized, pro-style offense, he's tearing it up this year. So yes, I think it's quite reasonable to look at his accuracy, decision making, physical traits, leadership traits, and mental acuity and see a guy who has the goods. Frankly, Van, you're offering a ridiculous opinion.
  41. 25 points
  42. 24 points
    We get it. He’s attractive but how do you feel about him as a QB?
  43. 24 points
  44. 24 points
  45. 23 points
    @Elky was banned for a month for his inappropriate post.
  46. 23 points
  47. 23 points
  48. 23 points
    Good. I'm clear of it now. Back to work tomorrow.
  49. 23 points
    Dudes made over $100m over his career. Don’t think he has to worry much about his bills
  50. 23 points
    What does his sense of morality have to do with anything
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00

  • Create New...