lark25

Over muscled with poor agility is an injury red flag but too early to call it

No love for Sean Lee? When he’s healthy he’s a top 5 LB. just happens to have 2 of the best upcoming star LBs on his team

Bengals actually have some good pieces just the way their put together

They might start Holcomb number one ranked Sparq linebacker had an 11’ broad 40” vert as well as good quicks. If his instincts are even decent it wouldn’t surprise me

Vikings are very balanced with the top 2 WR in the NFCN and the best TE. Sounds like their o line is improved too. only other good receiver I can think of in the NFCN is Davante Adams and he’s no Diggs let alone Thielen.

Their own fault for drafting a guy with known issues. High character is underrated.

Not sure about Sutton as it takes into account weight. Bosa had a 3 cone around 6.8 at 270lbs which is insane, similarly his short shuttle was also elite. Those quicks and agility plus his hand use make him elite. players have to be really explosive for explosion to rate them. Waldo formula also loved miles Garrett who is a sparq freak, so those guys do show up but only the real freaks.

Waldo formula really emphasises agility. Doesn’t like stiff athletes so someone like Jaylon Ferguson would be at the bottom of the pile according to it. it showed Joey Bosa to have off the charts agility and rated him as one of the lowest risk prospects. I remember sackseer wasn’t super high on him but run the Waldo numbers and he’s off the charts.

They’ve actually got a good line now. For a few years they featured a few overdrafted guys that just weren’t good

Ben Banogu - rich mans Samson Ebukam

Taysom Hull is different, he’s like 6’2 230, looks like a lb with a 4.4 40. Too tall/high cut to be a #1 rb but more athletic than 95% of pure rbs

THanks for the summary, that sounds more positive but I’m still not sold on taking a poor mans Kyle van noy in the 2nd

Which picks did you find to be the biggest head scratchers? For me it was Jahlani Tavai as the 3rd LB off the board. I might’ve missed something but there should’ve been at least 10 guys after him I would’ve picked before him as a no brainer. 6’2, 246lbs and didn’t run a 3cone. 4.86 40 was glacial compared to the others in the class. Just over 9’ broad, a below avg athlete. not hating the guy but that profiles more like a 5th 6th rounder if drafted in the modern game

Curious why Barton is so low? Tested a lot better than some of the guys above him. I like a combination of RAS and sparq when considering athleticism and generally look at: -quickness -speed -explosion; and -bench is just a checkbox doesn’t matter as much above a certain point. More guys that I’ve done more than might draw flags

Anthony Nelson has to be bpa