Yep. But the issue I have is comparing the contracts when you are using their whole career to 'judge' player X vs player Y. In this case its pretty clear that Adams did not get paid based on his first two years in the league. In fact, he was pretty bad. Adams got paid on what he did these past two seasons.
So yes, Diggs has had a higher per game avg for their careers because Diggs has been better over the course of their young careers. However, when you project and look at contacts its pretty easy to see that Adams got paid based on what he showed the past two seasons. In those seasons they are very comparable players, with Adams probably having the slight edge.
Does what I'm saying make sense?
Regardless, I don't want to hijack your thread anymore. This is a good contract deal for you guys. You should be happy.