Jump to content

husker_vikes3

Veteran Members
  • Content count

    18,238
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

32 Rookie

Favorites

  • NFL Team
    Vikings
  • MLB Team
    Red Sox
  • NBA Team
    Celtics
  • College Team
    Nebraska

Other Information

  • Location
    Omaha

Recent Profile Visitors

273 profile views
  1. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    They're gone for me too. But teams that have a player on IR have one?
  2. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    Trade! @Dome receives Jaylen Samuels @husker_vikes3 receives Mark Ingram, 2020 3rd
  3. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    Never mind lol. Still looking to trade for a QB!
  4. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    Look out guys, I finally got a second QB!
  5. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    Cool. My point is before the increase 20 made sense. 7 RBs, 7 WRs. Six spots split between QB, TE, D and K. In a 16-team league, most teams will want to roster at least 2 tight ends and 2 QBs. One spot each for D and K. But the choice still was there to have 6 RBs or 6 WRs and hold three TEs or three QBs or two defenses or two kickers. Now, having six RBs or six WRs becomes a little bit less palatable. You're behind the eight ball. Give the teams the ability to hold eight of a position and they likely will. Doesn't make sense to then leave four or even five spots for four positions in the lineup — especially when those four positions are starters and two of which you need to carry depth behind. Especially when our justification is "Oh, it adds flexibility for teams to add their draft picks." We've been playing with 7 RBs and 7 WRs for years, made it work, made tough choices. I know I was in favor of it, but in retrospect it seems like a rash decision, especially if we're not increasing roster size by one or two spots. And I'm not pushing for this so I can add an eighth running back or something. Right now, my roster is 1 QB, 7 RBs, 8 WRs, 2 TEs, 1 D and 1 K. I have zero flexibility to add a backup QB or a bye week defense or kicker without dropping one of my RBs or WRs. We're not actually giving teams the "ability" or "flexibility" to stash fliers or deep bench guys. Also, apparently my word of the day was especially lol
  6. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    Most teams do have 7 and 7. However, most teams are also carrying at least two tight ends and two QBs. It doesn't add flexibility. It creates more issues. "Oh cool. I can roster this deep WR I want now. Oh wait. I have to cut my backup QB." Why increase position limits to a point that doesn't make sense to roster size? If we want to allow people to have eight of each, it limits the ability to roster other positions.
  7. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    @Adrenaline_Flux @pwny Doesn't make sense to me to keep the same roster size and increase RB/WR to 8. If someone wants to have eight of each, leaves four roster spots for QB, TE, D/ST and K. Not optimal for roster construction, IMO.
  8. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    Would roster size increase as well?
  9. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    I'd be in favor of this.
  10. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    Also, this is still true. Please no Ryan Tannehills.
  11. TAST Dynasty League Discussion - Draft underway

    @pwny I don't think we're going to finish the draft. At what point can we just sign free agents as we've done in the past?
×