LARams91

Right...but if we lose our chances are slim to none....

Record, win percentage. Same thing to me, better record is better win %. Yea obviously we have to keep it up, but it feels nice to at least be 6th seed.

No, we'd have 6th seed. We would have conference record over them. It's not wins, it's record.

We win and the Vikings lose we're the 6 seed. Let's get it!

Offensive issues are moot when Defense is only letting up 15 points....I understand the offensive line concerns, but if McVay can gameplan to get the ball out faster (like the Patriots do constantly) it will mitigate offensive line concerns.

Probably a high 7th though!

Talib is gone next year anyways. Doesn't really make sense.

Vaitai stinks, but I like the idea of using Reynolds as a trade chip.

That's fine, not disagreeing

This is what I said: The question was about athleticism, to which I was shining a light on how he is athletic and gave a comparison to his athletic traits. Never once was his play on the field mentioned.

Never said he was as good as Warner. Said they had comparable athleticism. Don't try to change my narrative.

I never said he was good...Please follow the logic train

Again, athleticism doesn't equate to performance 100%. Simply a statement of fact contrary to some Rams fans feeling Reeder can't move. Never said he was good, but with athleticism there's always a hope right haha

Way better is relative. Reeder had a 7 flat which is plenty quick. 6.9 by Warner is very good for the position sure

How about this, his athleticism is comparable to Fred Warner's. Granted athleticism doesn't make him as good of a linebacker, but the point here was athletic traits. There's something here. We'll see if his mind is up to the task.