Jump to content


Veteran Members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

841 Pro Bowl

Recent Profile Visitors

624 profile views
  1. 2020 Titans Off-Season

  2. 2020 Titans Off-Season

    relax dude. you're getting to be a broken record. it's an internet forum, man!! we all just want to see the titans win. a benefit of being a fan is getting to talk crazy at one point or another.
  3. 2020 Titans Off-Season

    Yeah, obviously we have no idea about the behind the scenes piece of this. But it is a bit of a strange "firing". I don't like the idea of Vrabel being the de-facto DC. Not one bit. It's sloppy and likely going to blow up in his face. But I've realized that I'm wrong 99.9% of the time, so it'll likely be a genius move.
  4. 2019-20 Celebration of Titans Thread

    That’s true but hey this is a CELEBRATION thread! I shall stop my non-celebrating
  5. 2019-20 Celebration of Titans Thread

    I’m nit-picking but that’s one “big play” in 16 games. Maybe he didn’t deserve the hype out of college (idk if he did or didn’t as I don’t follow college football very closely), but the scouting report had this guy listed as an amazing pass rusher and he rarely, if ever, flashes that type of skill. Again, 9 sacks in year 2 is a good number, but I feel that coaches and JRob expected a much more impactful “breakout year” from him and he didn’t preform like that. For me, I’d expect more from a second round pick that we traded up for
  6. 2019-20 Celebration of Titans Thread

    9 is a great number, but he cooled off big time at the end of the season and he just didn’t seem to show up at big moments of the game. I know thah doesn’t make a ton of sense, because a sack at any point in the game is a big benefit for that drive, but never was I like “thank goodness Landry made that play”
  7. 2019-20 Celebration of Titans Thread

    Not to be a Debbie downer and I’ve complained about Landry before, but he just doesn’t make impact on games. Disappears for long spells. based on the hype he had coming out of school and how we got a “steal” in round 2, I’m overall disappointed in his level of play. Need a hell of a lot more from him
  8. Dumb question but we're free to offer guys like Tanny, Henry, Ryan, etc new contracts now and not wait until FA starts in March, right?
  9. If we move on from Henry, we're going to likely need to invest some draft capital in a RB. Looking around the league, the highest consistent performers are (usually) drafted in the top 3 rounds. I am not against that, but I'd prefer Henry on a mutually-beneficial deal (I think we'd all agree on that). We don't have a Shanahan or McDaniels or Doug Pederson or Andy Reid running and designing this offense, so nobody should be acting like we can pick up a 5th rounder and get serious production from him. Art Smith improved much as a PLAY-CALLER this season, but his play designs leave a lot of room for improvement. Let's not get that twisted. If we had a true franchise QB, then our need for a productive RB isn't as significant. Regarding Tannehill -- I am still not convinced that he can win games for us if/when the running game isn't chugging along. Can the guy drop back and pick apart a defense? Because ultimately you're going to need that to win a SB. Frick any Foles argument, because with Pederson, he was able to do that. We don't have Doug Pederson designing this offense. I still think franchising Tanny is the right move. If we get Brady for 2 years, I'm fine with that, too. Either way, I think I'd prefer to spend that 2-3 round pick on a QB instead of a RB if Henry walks. But that's just me.
  10. Where does this RB/QB tree that you speak of grow? By the sounds of it, guys like Henry and Tanny just grow on trees. If I can find it, I have a shot at becoming a GM.
  11. 2020 Titans Off-Season

    But the analytics, Rage, the analytics
  12. From "The Guy of the Guy"

    ^^^blast at parties
  13. From "The Guy of the Guy"

    ^^^blast at parties
  14. From "The Guy of the Guy"

    to those who completely don't want Brady: Do you think that we can win a super bowl with Tannehill as our QB? yes or no
  15. From "The Guy of the Guy"

    We have much different definitions of 'elevating the level of play' of those around them. Tanny was awesome this year...historically good both in general and for our team...but to think he's the type of guy to transcend mediocre surround talent and improving their level of play to a high level is asinine. Brady is coming off his worst year, sure. But with the worst supporting cast of maybe his career, he still goes for 4k and 24 TDs. NE couldn't run the ball and had no receiver who could make a consistent impact outside the numbers. I can't help but think that Brady, surrounded by AJ, Corey, Smith, Hump and even Firkser, would be able to still keep our offense chugging along if/when Henry is neutralized. For the right price, I'd love to have Tanny back next year. But the idea that Brady would hurt this team stems from a sentiment other than his latest performance, if you ask me edit -- and to make it clear, I'm not pounding the table for Brady. I'd be excited and intrigued if we got him, but don't necessarily think he's 'right' for the team at this moment. That's JRob's decision to make. People in this forum tend to paint people on one end of the spectrum or the other, when there's a lot of grey area in between