Jump to content

ny92mike

Veteran Members
  • Content Count

    14,198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2,170 All-Pro

Favorites

  • NFL Team
    New York Giants
  • NBA Team
    Thunder
  • College Team
    Oklahoma State

Recent Profile Visitors

3,152 profile views
  1. He should be creating a group chat once we have a few names to add to the list. Hope to see you there.
  2. Sorry man...i posted a link to this in the bdl thread. Figured you saw it. You are always welcome dude. Hit up Pete.
  3. Did not know this....thanks for the valuable info. Has he been released to play by the docs yet?
  4. Guess I haven't been following to close...I thought McKinney was on IR. If this kid is healthy, I'd love to see him get some playing time. After all he was our early second rounder. If they did what would that secondary look like? Oh and @Acgott is the speed racer of posting.
  5. I loved the Bradberry pick up and after being burnt in the draft by several cornerback pickups. Wouldn't be surprised if they don't continue to fill via the free agency. I'd really like to see the Giants pick up a top edge player, but the line seems to be playing tough football on defense, so I'm leaning wide out if it doesn't require reaching. Golden Tate is likely gone after this year and while I like the other receivers none of them at least this point in their careers would be considered an elite receiver. Anyway that's my 2 cents and as always appreciate you taking the time to do these.
  6. This forum has a slew of draft gurus, in the NFL Draft forum as well as the NFL Mock Draft sub forum. Would be cool if we could work out something with those groups to do some commentating as players are drafted in this mock.
  7. @jrry32 tossing another name in the hat to help us out if available. As well as @Nick
  8. @EaglesPeteC / @Deadpulse / @squire12 / @scar988 / @samsel23 Pete can we start getting a list together of everyone willing to help out in getting this mock set up. I know that it always seems too early to be getting this stuff ready but with the holidays I feel like we should start.
  9. This being said. Using the tcmd model we know teams are allowed to bid on up to 3 UFA's per round, plus an additional bidding slot dedicated to resigning a player. It also contains a 6 bid slot reserve, that drops said player into the award process if another team places a bid on that player. And that after each round the minimum value you can offer a free agent decreases by a certain percentage. The number used to make the offer on a player is used to break matching offers, There are restrictions on how many years you can offer a player, which is determined by the positional age of the player. Formulas are used to weight guaranteed money higher than the base. There are percentage increases in the overall bid for attempts to resign players, current is 8%...meaning if the resign team is offering 10m the team looking to steal would need to spend 10.8 million. We also introduced a checkbox that would flag if another team was making on offer on a player that you are bidding on as well. Can't remember what the census was on it. That said some potential wrinkles to discuss Some mentioned in the past that they'd like to see an option that if they lost out on player x, that their bid for a player y would come into play. Their argument was that it would prevent being awarded two players of somewhat equal value from the same position. Perhaps, something we could discuss to see if we couldn't find a workaround that would allow for something to account for this without rewriting the entire structure. However, the current systems structure does account for this at least in part, if you get outbid, take the bidding to the next round. Personally, I think it looks cool on the surface but I have reserves about the current structures of something like this as it has the potential to rapidly drain the free agent pool of talent much faster and make it more difficult for teams with less cap to get their hands on some quality free agents. Willing to discuss it to see if these kinks could be ironed out to make it work. Perhaps if we devalued the second offer by a heavier percentage, like 10 or 12 percent. So the second bid would really need to be overvalued cap wise. Anyway just spitballing, if you guys have any other ideas for some added wrinkles post it.
  10. The reason why I was saying for the pitch to come in early is so that we arent waiting for them to write it so that it doesn't slow anything down. Guess it probably wouldn't matter since it would be like 5 total if that.
  11. Btw I'm perfectly happy with running the fa like weve done in tcmd since we started. It works we know it works and it rarely leads to any arguments. Just looking at options to appease the ones that would like to see some form of a pitch without getting wild with it.
  12. The pitch value would be a fixed %. 2 to 5% so offers would need to be really close in value for it to even apply. I get the public vote was just suggesting an alterative to requiring an agent. Its not the pitch I fear its the adding of agents.
  13. The only issue I have with added roles like starter is it would require us to check the depth constantly to make sure the play stays there. Just seems like added work to keep track of. For example I check starter and a week later I move him to depth or just adjust it at the end of the season. Signed devils advocate
×
×
  • Create New...