Jump to content

eyecatcher

Veteran Members
  • Content count

    454
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

154 Veteran

Favorites

  • NFL Team
    Green Bay Packers
  • College Team
    Wisconsin

Other Information

  • Location
    SW Michigan
  • Hobbies
    Walleye Fishing.

Recent Profile Visitors

261 profile views
  1. 2018 Free Agency - Prospects for GB

    I can't believe da bears haven't picked him up.
  2. 2018 Free Agency - Prospects for GB

    Do you have a better answer?
  3. Wk 3 postgame: GB 17 • WAS 31

    No more irrelevant than thinking his game yesterday is enough to phase him out.
  4. Wk 3 postgame: GB 17 • WAS 31

    The arm chair coaching and knee jerk reactions to a bad game are ridiculous. (not directed at you) Aaron Jones will see the field plenty. Rodgers is hobbled and obviously needs the blocking hence Williams getting the most reps. Montgomery in his few touches has been productive. Saying he shouldn't see the field doesn't make sense. He isn't seeing the field much as it is but when he's out there he's made positive plays. R-E-L-A-X We all knew the defense would take a bit to get sorted out. They've shown flashes and will continue to improve. I'm not ready to fire MM, bench any particular player, or give up on them yet.
  5. Wk 3 postgame: GB 17 • WAS 31

    That is just a dumb statement. Cobb is on pace for 1000 yards receiving. Yeah he had a couple drops but he also saved the game for the Packers two weeks ago.
  6. GDT Week 4 - Bills (1-2) @ Packers (1-1-1)

    Cobb redeems himself and will be POTG. 2 TDs 85 yards and Graham Adams and Jones will get one too. Clay Matthews will put Josh Allen on his back twice and will not be flagged for RTP because this is how he will do it. https://i.imgur.com/SrewGqr.mp4
  7. Where’s Norm?

    FIFY
  8. I remember when Mason Foster was a free agent sitting at home without a team and the Packers were in desperate need of a LB. I was so pissed at TT when they didn't go get him. Now he's playing chess as the QB of the Redskins D.
  9. Wk 2 postgame: GB 29 •MIN 29 (OT)

    The certainly aren't trading him to Green Bay probably not even for a 1st.
  10. Wk 2 postgame: GB 29 •MIN 29 (OT)

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000694979/article/sam-bradford-traded-to-vikings-for-two-draft-picks
  11. This Aint Packers Talk v69

    It was an extraordinary performance. Taylor was 4-14 for 19 yards and 0 points when he left the game. Mayfield came in and was 3-4 for 47 yards and a FG. For Cleveland that was extraordinary. Then he went on to lead the comeback and win the game. That is extra extraordinary considering it had been 635 days since their last win.
  12. This Aint Packers Talk v69

    Good call. I felt the same way. Bet you didn't see it going down the way it did though, with Baker coming in to mount the comeback. It was must see TV.
  13. Wk 2 postgame: GB 29 •MIN 29 (OT)

    Is that a serious question? Last year they wouldn't have done well at all because the defense was a major liability. This year remains to be seen how good the defense can be. But let's be honest. Do you think Case Keenum can repeat his last year performance? So far it's looking more like the Case Keenum people expect. If Cousins goes down, how good do you think the Vikings are gonna be with Trevor Siemian? Will he be able to win a game? Last year the Vikings caught lightning in a bottle. It won't happen again so you'd better hope that o-line can keep Cousins upright the whole season. Note: Cousins was a bad call away from 325 yards 3 TDs and 2 INTs and a big L so don't act like the Packers defense was terrible. Rodgers was a few bad DPI, OPI, and Holding calls away from 350 yards 3 or 4 TDs, 0 INTs and a big W
  14. I thought I was talking about the Bears. I think he would have helped us but I get why we didn't get him and am not looking back. This was more a rub on Oakland than anything. Not even sure how you got anything else out of that post. I do also get why Oakland did it but it is funny that he's outplaying their entire D
  15. Whatever the Bears gave up for Mack must seem like a bargain now. Oakland defensive stats through Week 2: 2 Sacks for 13 yards, 1 INT, 0 Forced Fumbles, 0 Fumbles Recovered, 0 TDs Khalil Mack Defensive stats through week 2: 2 Sacks for 21 yards, 1 INT, 2 Forced Fumbles, 1 Fumbles Recovered, 1 TDs
×