Jump to content


Veteran Members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

153 Veteran

Recent Profile Visitors

201 profile views
  1. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    Don't vote for me to come back. I don't want to play with the miserable scum that voted me out. You could have let me stay until the jury and I would have been happy. Instead you're all just as bad as @JBURGE now and he's Canadian.
  2. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    A challenge shouldn’t come down to trust. Sorry you’re offended. You challenged me to come up with 10 ****ty challenges, and the second I offer improvements to one of yours it’s like I slapped you in the face. I never pretended to be offering constructive criticism. I was just trying to understand the logic of holding a challenge that’s completely outside of the hands of the contestants. So yeah it’s on me, but it doesn’t affect me personally. Just making sure everybody in the game has a fair chance at immunity.
  3. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    Okay. I'll bite again. Giving yourself a half an hour of leeway due to irl responsibilities is fine and all. As I mentioned before, real life comes before forum games. However, this allows you way too much influence in the challenge. Nothing is stopping you from being prejudice in your decision making as long as it's within the half hour window you allocated yourself. When this forum is active, a half hour could be a ton of posts. So players aren't getting a fair chance. If you wanted to adjust for real life variations, perhaps you should have done the stoppages over certain post counts and messaged that to the CC. Then it would be random on behalf of the players, and there would be an actual check system with the CC. Once you post stop when you're able, the post count starts back up again. Any post made after the original figure would then be irrelevant and a new cycle with the new players would begin once you announce the eliminated player. I don't mind players targeting others. That is perfectly fine. I encourage that, so I have no problem whatsoever with that aspect of this challenge, or any other challenge. I'm not saying I could do better. I'm just suggesting challenges can't have the appearance of being biased, and this one does.
  4. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    The times need to match up exactly then. Even messaging a CC doesn’t void the challenge of controversy. It’s easy to adjust times to fit a window or edit a screenshot. You can call me out all you want, but I didn’t fail to come up with a challenge because I am unable. My schedule literally didn’t allow me the time to put towards this game. So try to call me stupid all you want, but it just comes across as arrogant. Real life comes before a silly forum game we play for fun. I swear you’re turning into the Jason of hosting. If you want suggestions on how to possibly alter this challenge for future iterations let me know. I have plenty of ideas. I’ve ran successful forum based games on different sites and can definitely help you out if you wanted. I’m not short on challenge ideas. I’d even do it for free!
  5. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    I'm just gonna say it. This challenge is terrible. It's dictated by the host. If he has a vendetta against a player he can just post stop and have them lose. I'm not saying he is doing that, I trust his integrity. The players themselves need to have some control over the challenge and dictate their own fates. There isn't even a little bit of that in this one. It's completely out of their hands. One player can sit on a tag for hours and another could sit on a tag for 30 seconds and be SOL. I can't see this challenge not being controversial. 100% serious this time.
  6. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    Uh huh. I even went and told my mom everything that happened, and she said that he's being very unfair! I know I was inactive and don't blame anybody for tossing old Dwight aside. Just a bad time for the games to start as I've been transitioning from one job to another and having to work both in the meantime. Is what it is, we will try to come back and wreck some havoc. In the meantime, everybody still in the game should prepare apologies for me.
  7. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    Whoa, hold on. We had until noon CST Monday to vote. I was saving my vote until the deadline to ensure all options were considered. You can't just push the game forward without me voting, even if it wouldn't change the outcome. Jeff Probst doesn't stop players from voting even when the vote is unanimous. I think we need to revote. This is a clear collusion case where my voice is trying to be silenced! I will go on Fox News to dispel this hypocrisy.
  8. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    Idk. I won BB too. How many remember that dominating performance?
  9. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    I'm gonna host the next Survivor game and make sure you're on Exile Island the entire time.
  10. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    Can I abstain from submitting moves for the current challenge? Not participating is my game right now so I don't wanna mess it up.
  11. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    Why did people vote for me? I've tried to be the fat, lovable sidekick this time around.
  12. What Are You Thinking About v.CC

    My email comes up on so many breaches, including one on Myspace back in 2008. I'm gonna chalk that up as a loss, pretend I didn't see anything, and continue as if they never happened. Nobody wants my student loan debt anyway. I hope they enjoy the coupons my mom was always asking me to email her.
  13. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    omg, this game is still going on?
  14. Survivor III: Winners Versus Losers

    I opt out submitting a vote