snackattack

ah yes, the old "fool's mate". but he is playing higher level chess, running a gambit where he sacrifices stats and some wins over a long period of time in order to lure his opponents into a false sense of security and bad positioning. i kid. it is frustrating watching him hold the ball all the time.

LOL Ragnar is not my alter account

rodgers is playing chess at a higher level. he is making everyone think he sucks so that he can ball out in the playoffs and superbowl.

This is our only shot at getting a first round bye at this point right? Assuming saints win out beyond this game.

This is good stuff, and echoes a point that @Packerraymond made in another thread. It seems that the veteran players are contributing to the team persona moreso than in the past few years.

I think 2016 is a better comparison to this year, and an example of how a team that doesn't have a dominant statistical year can go deep in the playoffs. we averaged a couple points more of offense in 2016 but also average a few more points allowed on defense, and we went to the NFCCG. its about getting hot at the right time.

all these stats being talked about have their value, but at the end of the day it is all about making the dance and getting hot at the right time.

You assume the packers would have taken allen over gary. “Tanking works” is a lame mindset during the season, its worse when people combine it with know-it-all hindsight and say “see?!!??”

Totally not worth a trade

probably my favorite packer of all time. his overall performance during the 2008-2010 seasons was simply amazing and so fun to watch.

Nice mock though!

Coming from the guy who made a thread criticizing the pre-snap abilities of an nfl quarterback! You love you some you bro. Wish i had that kind of swagger.

i read just about all your posts and i honestly don't know what your point is in all of this. what is your overall stance on rodgers? are you saying he isn't worth his contract, that he isn't a super bowl caliber QB, that he isn't a playoff caliber QB? all of the above? much of the discussion has revolved around arguing / refuting specific points that people have made, which is fine for discussion, but i don't know how to put all of that discussion in context without knowing your overall view that your specific points are stemming from.

you know the season is going really well when people resort to beating up on blake martinez.

Rodgers or the coaches? And please no screen shots...