resilient part 2

You guys are a ****IN joke. For a season and a half Dak made many good and accurate throws and at a good/very good rate. Now it's show every possible bad throw video out there. It now makes perfect sense. Some of you are or were "butt hurt" that Dak took/was-given the job over Romo. So instead of looking at everything in proper context, such as all the history of coaching/GMing INCOMPETENCE before and after Dak's arrival. You just dissect and over magnify anything and everything anti-Dak possible. Like he didn't ever play well. Dude was 1 freakin defensive play from beating the GREAT A Rodgers and advancing to a game from the SB. Dak didn't do it with a mere 200yds passing either. Dak played great all along the way that year. BUT since then what has happened? The mighty O-line (injury or not) is no longer dominant. The weapons that Romo flourished under, are long gone and HAVEN"T been replaced. All while the same coaches, who went from 12-4 (2014) to what 3-13?the following year with some of the poorest offensive games ever. All before Dak arrived. A coaching staff that had how many 8 and 8 seasons with the so called "great Romo" Yet DAK is the blame of it all now. What a ****IN joke. I really don't know how long I can stay involved on a site where "some posters" have posted 95+% of their posts on negative Dak comments. Simple minded, stupid rhetoric that if said often enough might blind the masses to following the narrative.

While I won't disagree with your statement, it is not the entire truth. I do believe, as I have repeated many times, until Dallas gets better weapons and obviously better coaches, Dak will have a hard time improving. So while some of it is on him other things need to be put in place to help Dak improve his overall game and confidence.

ah ha so he is top 3 and bottom 3

The one thing that Sean Lee has done better than almost anyone I've ever seen is diagnoser play and be at the right spot at the right time. I don't know how that can be taught. I think he just had great instincts. Hopefully some can rub off onto lve

While I still had hoped for weapons weapons weapons, draft an l v e I guess was a no-brainer unfortunately because of Lee. Oh well we drafted him let's see what he got and I hope we got it right

I really wonder if this current staff makes it to years end, if Dallas continues their stinkers. I'd almost prefer Dallas getting blown out to at least guarantee a complete shakeup than to go on with Mediocre success.

Fish fly, Hell freezes over and a few other things happen before JJ ever does that. He will have to be 6th under first. And even then he will find away to pul some strings from the grave.

I tried to "like" this post but ran out of them. But in the meantime, I agree. Dak getting sacked last year all-game long by 1 DE and the coaches never adjusting is total proof of how bad they are at in game adjusting especially.

This single sentence IMO is the entire summary of this debate. Does anyone know what Dak can or can't do if he had coaching advantages vs disadvantages? We have seen what happens to teams who seemingly seem lost, yet under a new coach/direction and some changes, a team who was not expected to be good turns it around in a year. Rams and Philly of course are the latest examples. Dallas has suffered incompetent coaching and disappointments LONG before Dak got here.

Perhaps the real question should be asked, what is the difference between Dak and his first 25 or so games till now? Can a quarterback who did play well for a much longer time than he played Poorly all of a sudden forget everything he did well? Or did circumstances change around him combined with perhaps his loss of confidence trigger these poor results. If you ask me it is up collection of failings that have contributed to the poor production of a quarterback and the offense.

From what I heard I would be willing to take him in a heartbeat

This is where we disagree. The problem, IMO, is more coaching and lack of talent at the "weapon positions" than Dak. Not claiming Dak is not without his own problems, but the amount of blame is getting out of control for Dak. After the game, Terry Bradshaw and the Fox crew talked about the problems with Dallas and the offense. SL (play-calling and creativity/predictability) and the lack of weapons were the subject of the criticism not Dak. So at least I am not alone in that regard.

probably not. of course if Ridley was on Dallas, he probably would be running 7 yd slant ins or button hooks.

Julio Jones, considered by many, the top WR in football, caught only 3 tds all of last year. He had Matt Ryan throwing as well. But what does Atlanta do? they get one of the top WRs in the draft. Why? they acknowledged the need for another weapon to stop teams from doubling up on Jones. what does Dallas do after losing an aging Witten and Dez? put 7 WRs and 5 TEs on the roster who are basically just plug in nobody specials or even worse. Sometimes "you get what you pay for"

shamed to admit this made me LOL.