Jump to content

15412

Members
  • Content Count

    922
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

84 Starter

Recent Profile Visitors

542 profile views
  1. I called it too. SO many laughed at it when I said he would be traded or retained, why would anyone cut a starting quality O-Lineman? The Packers may have tried to move him, teams instead hoped they would indeed cut him. This is a good retain by the Packers, and he could get moved yet. I'd rather move Turner.
  2. This indeed was a fun read. No OBJ for me, but otherwise I really like this. This team has little record of trading future high picks though, against the religion in GB. Love who you got though. Now ixnay on the OBJ and spend those draft picks we didn't trade away....instead
  3. Sometimes the draft trade charts are a bit skewed, I also think we get more. I wouldn't want to drop from 30 to 44 for that return. I like the make up otherwise, although while we only have so many picks I know I feel we need to address D-Line a bit more. Maybe we yet pick up a veteran FA. And sign Veldheer for the OT position in addition. Then I sleep better in the balsams.
  4. IF this could happen, it would be incredible. I had your 2nd pick as our first in my mock. Love this mock
  5. I also think we can do better than DPJ in Round 2 and I don't like the Hooper singing for the dough we will have to give him. I want to stick as much money as possible in the trenches. Really like it otherwise. Veldheer if healthy will indeed get that kind of money. A+ for effort, solid A- for substance.
  6. There are always areas where players maybe could find improvement but the NFL overall needs to hold strong on things like cap and parity. I'm not just talking about this CBA but future ones.. Look at the pathetic mess MLB has with the rich TV contract big city teams having extreme advantage over the small market teams. The NFL has done it right.
  7. You put a lot of work in this, and I like a lot of that work. I also don't like a lot of that work. Let me start with I don't like losing Bulaga or Linsley. I hate losing both beyond words. I also do not like moving Jenkins. Begelton and Sharpe at WR? I don't really like Dye, but you won't get him that late. Makes me dizzy, a lot of moving parts that aren't supposed to move....
  8. You can try Richardson out to see what's left if curious. Won't cost anything but a plane ticket and lunch. Might as well re-sign Ryan Grant. We will sign a mid and/or lower range veteran WR, with no guarantee they will make the team. Our improvement will come from present bodies and through the draft more than likely.
  9. Not fun for me. So disturbing on so many levels.....
  10. Two things I liked. Re-signing the white whale foremost, and about time someone gave us Cephus. That's it.
  11. Initially as I began to read it down I was hating it, but in total if you could pull this off it makes total sense. A couple players I do not like in the draft but that's par for the course. A couple of moves highly unlikely, and I don't have to tell you which ones. Beyond highly unlikely....
  12. I like Delpit a lot, but is he clearly the best prospect at 30? Worthy more than likely yes, but the most worthy? I just don't know about that. I only brought up Fromm because of how high he was once thought of and how low he might drop. Limitations are obvious, but there just may be a surprise there at some point.
  13. One could start a new thread just about prospects liked that aren't locks to be 1st Round picks, concentration on later round picks. I guess here is good enough. I like Justin Madubuike. He could go Round 1 late, but likely not Ross Blacklock probably more likely 1, but could tumble to round 2. We need a D-lineman to not only quickly develop but who could help immediately. While signing a veteran is likely, I still like one like these two. LB Malik Harrison, DL, Davon Hamilton, TE's like Adam Trautman and Hunter Bryant, WR's like Gabriel Davis, Van Jefferson, Quintez Cephus. Be interesting to see where they go. How far can QB Jake Fromm fall? At what point do we take him? What I'm asking is at what point would he clearly be the best prospect on the board and too good to pass on?
  14. I think you are optimistic on what Watkins will take. He concerns me, for a number of reasons. He will want a longer term deal with the big up front money. I find it difficult to believe he would settle for the contract you offer. Regardless, like I said, he concerns me. Ability to stay healthy, desire to play and perform. Potential head case when it doesn't happen for him. Lee also concerns me for very different reasons. Losing Bulaga concerns me. Veldheer is a nice signing and I hope that does happen. Not enough done to replace the white whale. OT becomes my numero uno draft need with him gone. To get Reagor with our 2nd would be a windfall. Even in this deep WR class, I don't like the odds. No doubt if you allow Martinez to walk we need to replace him, you have with Lee and Queen. But the cost is no OT until the late 3rd and a vet who likely will not hold up as a starter for the majority of the season. I'm also not sold on Queen this high. I like the D-Linemen you added in FA, but again not sure they will tip for those contracts. We definitely need to improve here, and you've drafted nobody. Very concerning for me....
×
×
  • Create New...