Jump to content

ThirtyOne-EightyNine

Members
  • Posts

    109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ThirtyOne-EightyNine

  1. 3 minutes ago, AFlaccoSeagulls said:

    Couple of things:

    • That Malik Turner drop essentially ended the game by itself
    • Pete choosing to punt instead of relying on Russell Wilson is predictable but so stupid
    • Seahawks not doubling Davante Adams and instead choosing to put Ugo Amadi on him 1v1 on 3rd and 9 is just asinine
    • That spot was ATROCIOUS
    • Green Bay was like 85% on 3rd downs tonight. There's your story of the game.

    Russell Wilson deserves better than this lol

    While I agree it should have been Griffin on him, any other safety in the league would have shaded on Adams on that play to help Amadi. Hill was atrocious that last drive. As he has been all year. No logical reason that Blair isnt in instead of him. Boils down to Pete being Pete.

  2. Theres a 1% chance anyone gets fired next year. Maybe Norton but i really doubt that since the players love him. A blow out loss would just help others see what i see. I dont know why most are happy just making it in the playoffs. We have been in the mix for 7 seasons now with this regime and obviously have been to two SBs. But being content with just making it the post season seems backwards to me. The thought of 'anything can happen in the playoffs' is true, but not a recipe for championship contention in my opinion.

  3. 25 minutes ago, showtime said:

    Wait, you want the Seahawks to lose?

    I do. I dont like how the team is coached. Personnel decisions are pathetic. I can only assume Hill is starting because he 'knows the system' more than Blair. But I dont remember seeing Blair actually do anything wrong or be out of position. I only watch the games live though so who knows what they see on tape. Meanwhile, Hill is out here missing tackles and blowing coverages because he is a worthless player who cant even play special teams. That is obvious live AND on tape but it doesnt mean anything apparently. 

     

    Trying to establish a respectable running game and then hoping our top 5 QB can keep us in it and eek out a win every week instead of just letting the run game compliment our superior pass offense. This is not the team Pete had in 2012-2016 but he insists he can make these guys be that

    Why he wants Russell to just manage the game instead of be the guy no one wants to face is beyond me. 

    I'm tired of seeing/expecting the same thing every week. I probably should just stop watching to be honest😂. This is the only place i vent about them so most of my posts are negative. 

     

    I couldnt help but smile watching Lynch run again though. It was worth it to see that again.

  4. 15 minutes ago, N4L said:

    Been thinking about this. He's going to be pass blocking for them. Their OL is crap, and his cardio isn't gonna be good. He can stand in the pocket and be Wilson's protector.

    That's where going through running backs hurts you most, pass blocking. You basically can't ask guys off the street to do it. 

    I'd bet Seattle puts him on the field for the first play and then runs DK Metcalf deep on Witherspoons side and tries to set the tone with a long td. 

    I don't think our defensive coordinator is smart enough to figure that out lol 

    I dont think our offensive coordinator is smart enough to try that. 

     

    A 2 yard loss on the read option it shall be.

    • Like 3
  5. I hate that we can win the division. We dont deserve it. I have no idea how Pete thinks King and Hill are the best options at corner and safety. Blair should be starting. Amadi should be outside unless we are in nickel. 

     

    Just pathetic offense. Making the Cardinals D look like the 00 Ravens. 

     

    I get that fans can be happy about making the playoffs and winning games but i care more about HOW we win. If all our wins are by 1 possession and all our losses are by 2 possessions we really are not a good team. We have no business being a top 12 team this year. I blame it all on scheme. Pete needs to change his philosophy on both sides of the ball or get players who are actually going to make his scheme work. That would mean investing heavy on the O-line and D-line. Which he never has done. I am very disappointed and frustrated with this team.

  6. 4 hours ago, BillSabre said:

    Ahhh, hard to trust Mack you say.  Carolina has the worst run D in the league I believe, no? Who’s playing QB for them this week? I’m actually leaning Mack and trying to choose between Lockette and Chubb.  My gut is telling me too sit Chubb.  If Julio doesn’t play then it all works itself out anyway. 

    Well look at what Mack has done since returning. He doesnt get any passes thrown his way or seem to be the go to guy again yet. Chubb will at least get more touches to do something even if its against a better defense. I have both in the finals in my league too and not sure who to start.

  7. Just now, ITS_RAMMY_PLAYBOI said:

    The rams were in the SB last year. They’ve been beating the hawks like a drum since Mcvay got there. The rams aren’t a bad team there for their SB game is literally the Super Bowl. They aren’t a 7-9

     

    I know you dont like to read before replying to a post but that is what i said. They come to play against the Seahawks. Not for the Superbowl. 

  8. 1 minute ago, I <3 Faulk said:

    Jajajaja what? I almost wish I could live in such a bubble that I could believe such an asinine thing to be true.

    Are you kidding? 15 years of me watching these two teams go at it and no matter how good Seattle is the Rams give it their all. So because the Rams are better recently that means they have more to play for than just beating the Seahawks? How about that beat down they gave Seattle IN Seattle? It obviously means more than winning a Superbowl. I didnt see that kind of effort there.

  9. Just now, rocky_rams said:

    How? When the rams have been better the last 3 years 

    That must be how long you've been a fan of the Rams.

     

    They always come to play against Seattle. They arent going to win anything else so this is all they can hang their hat on every year.

  10. 3 hours ago, KingOfTheNorth said:

    I need some TE help this week. I have Hunter Henry and Evan Engram but Henry is on bye and Engram is injured. Best options of TEs on the waiver wire are Greg Olson, Dallas Goedert, Delanie Walker, Vance McDonald, and Cameron Brate.  I think Goedert and Delanie have the highest ceiling but Olson probably has the highest floor. Brate is a great option if Howard is still riding the bench but I haven't seen any report that confirms this. Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Seattle is terrible at covering TEs. I picked Goedert up in case Kittle cant play. 

  11. Jamar Taylor was released to make room for Ed Dickson coming off IR. So Ugo will be the nickel back here on out. Which im glad. I hope we play as much nickel as we did against SF. The pass D was much better with Kendricks off the field. Kendricks is having a good season but our opponents seem to know how to beat that look through the air rather easily.

    • Like 1
  12. Seattle is pretty bad except Wilson. I expect it to be 31-10 going into the 4th with Russ getting a couple garbage time TDs to make the score look closer than it was. Similar to the Saints game.

     

    34-24 9ers. Unfortunately.

  13. 1 hour ago, animaltested said:

    Slight over reaction, before this game, Iupati was probably Seattle best performing lineman. 

    BUT its nice to know Jones can play inside outside. Was really scared when I saw him lineup at LG, but he didn't seem to make any big mistakes. Fant, Jones and Pocic (who needs to get his ish together) over a ton of flexibility along the line. 

    You think so? I've seen him and Ifedi whiff or just not block somebody multiple times a game this season watching the game live. I dont have the access to rewatch games so i cant go back and see. Brown has been the best in my opinion. Especially in pass protection 

×
×
  • Create New...