Jump to content

raidr4life

Veteran Members
  • Content Count

    11,940
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,309 All-Pro

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The rumors are really flying that Gruden is willing to give anything to get Rodgers
  2. Lol the moved to Vegas was brilliant Mark doesn't get enough credit for that he will not give up this future cash cow.
  3. He can't wear thin on players because he gets rid of all the vets the young guys haven't been around long enough.
  4. I would start Moerig too, but having Hooker as cheap insurance and a pure FS as backup can let Kjo and Abrams play SS.
  5. Can't go wrong with giving Hooker a chance so we can have two pure FS on the roster rotating. with Kjo and Abrams at SS, giving Gillespie time to develop that would be perfect.
  6. Still like to add Malick Hooker
  7. Lol this entire forum knows we needed a tackle, and it's mostly not about who we picked but where we picked him.
  8. Just a note Gruden since has been here the media heads had us taking these guys with our top pick.. 2018- Darwin James, BPA 2019- Josh Allen, BPA 2020- CeeDee Lamb, Top WR 2021- Not sure since I didn't watch the talking heads this year, but I know it wasn't Leatherwood.
  9. Look if Cable is so good then he should be able to coach up top talent like Darrishaw, Jenkins, Eisenberg, Little, and even still Leatherwood who all could have been had with a trade down while gaining 3rd and 4th round picks. And honestly Cable should have had 2 or 3 options he liked, so they could work the draft instead of acting like this guy was the only good OT on the board. Even worst Mayock claimed he could have made a trade but that team wanted an OT, if that's true I'm willing to bet said team was going to grab Darrishaw and not Leatherwood lol. Re posted for some reason
  10. Look if Cable is so good then he should be able to coach up top talent like Darrishaw, Jenkins, Eisenberg, Little, and even still Leatherwood who all could have been had with a trade down while gaining 3rd and 4th round picks. And honestly Cable should have had 2 or 3 options he liked, so they could work the draft instead of acting like this guy was the only good OT on the board. Even worst Mayock claimed he could have made a trade but that team wanted an OT, if that's true I'm willing to bet said team was going to grab Darrishaw and not Leatherwood lol.
  11. Sure he was considered a reach but I had predicted Gruden was going to shock the world and take Miller who I was high on, even over the guy SF took, but I still expected it would be with a trade down, and this is were they routinely fail. Even if your reach pans out the difference between a good draft and great draft is working the draft and adding even more assets with a chance to add more good players and make it a great draft. The Raiders could have had the same top two picks added more picks instead we lost a pick.
  12. Lol this teams horrible track record on drafting is the reason it looks bad.
  13. Lol they used this same excuse every time they reach, that someone else was gong to take him, they said that about Arnette last year. They could have traded down added more picks and still got Darrishaw who everybody loved or Jenkins any of the good Ots that were left even still got Leatherwood. Them trying to act like Leatherwood is some once in a generation talent they had to have is a joke.
×
×
  • Create New...