Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

301 Veteran


  1. 2019 Draft Discussion

    Great Blue North did a one round mock with 3 of it's staff. the results were: #12 OT Jawaan Taylor......................#30 TE Irv Smith (Pigskin Paul) #12 TE T.J.Hockenson......................#30 Edge Clelin Ferrell (Larry Parker) #12 OT Jonah Williams......................#30 WR A.J.Brown ('Grumpy' Lindsay) I'd be ok with any of them, but I do like Parkers the best.
  2. 2019 Draft Discussion

    Not true at all. Teams have different needs which is why trades occur. You are both right. Those two assertions are not mutually exclusive.
  3. 2019 Draft Discussion

    So let me get this straight, you like Burns then ?
  4. 2019 Draft Discussion

    If the Packers wanted wanted Washington's 3rd at #76 (and not their comp 3rd at #86), then they'd probably have to give up their own 4th (#118) to balance things. That's fine if all the guys you want are gone, but pretty awful if there is a prime prospect left on the board. If I see one of Oliver/Wilkins/Burns/Ferrell/J.Taylor there, I don't move back. Swapping a 3rd for a 4th just doesn't move me, not with good guys available. Of course, who a 'good guy' is, is down to personal preference. For others that might be Bush or D.K. or Hock or Dillard.
  5. 2019 Draft Discussion

    I was exactly the same in the Landry/Davenport choice, I tend to think pure speed guys struggle more in the NFL than guys who might have less bend but more power. However, since the Packers have the Smiths, having Burns coming off the edge gives offenses a different kind of problem, and I'm very much on board with being able to give different looks. That said, my fave rusher this year is Ferrell, but there you go. I'd be very happy if Burns was the pick, though.
  6. 2019 Draft Discussion

    I had Mike Bell as a possible later pick until he ran an awful 4.83 40. Hooker could do it in a pinch, he is a heck of an athlete, though SS is said to be his best spot. There are plenty of good safeties this year, including free safeties, it's just that single high demands high-tier skills.
  7. 2019 Draft Discussion

    Thompson, Gardner-Johnson, Thornhill, Adderley, Savage
  8. 2019 Draft Discussion

    No it isn't reported anywhere, it's just a question asked to see how people felt about moving up, when it isn't round 1 being discussed.
  9. 2019 Draft Discussion

    I wasn't as clear as i could have been. i was referring to safeties who could play single high. Not many have the range for that.
  10. 2019 Draft Discussion

    He is a good downhill player. Seriously, since there are only maybe five viable FS types in this draft, it doesn't do to forget any of them.
  11. 2019 Draft Discussion

    Jacksonville makes the Packers a draft trade deal, BUT they have to finalise the swap before draft day. Question: Would you trade the Packers second rounder (#44 worth 460 points on the J.J. chart) and their second, round 4 pick (#118 worth 58), for Jax's 38th pick (worth 520 points). I think I probably would do it, but it's a tough choice when you don't know who will be on the board. Every year I end up wanting a high 2nd rounder because there always seem to be prospects i like, that are projected to go there
  12. NFL News & Notes

    wrong forum
  13. Time to hold Mark Murphy accountable?

    Mark Murphy was accountable. He is accountable. He will be accountable, as long as he is CEO. This seems to be the blame game wrapped in an accountability sandwich.
  14. Consensus Mock Draft - Post Combine - Pick 30 - Green Bay Packers

    Not a very exciting bunch to choose from. I went for WR N'Keal Harry first, then G Chris Lindstrom, then I picked a guy not listed, G Erik McCoy
  15. 2019 Draft Discussion

    No. I agree with that. Excepting trades in the first handful of picks, it is so difficult to predict how the draft will really play out. Specifying who a team is moving up for, after the first, say, 10 picks, is like shooting to hit a black cat in an unlit cellar at midnight.