Jump to content

RuskieTitan

Veteran Members
  • Content Count

    53,724
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by RuskieTitan

  1. boy, completely banking on the fact that nacho may not be back could wind up blowing up if it turns out to not be the case. Then its like pwny said, if you get the ship, it was worth it. But if you don't... you've handicapped yourself for two seasons. Or at least your franchise is. I can't yet say what I'd do in my situation, if nacho does hang it up. But going out yoloing with the perspective of "screw the person taking over if my gamble doesn't pay off bc I will take my ball" seems weaksauce.
  2. For the same reason you don't see millionaires dropping six figures on a 5 year, 80,000 mile Toyota Camry - sure it beats walking, but you are overpaying what it's truly worth.
  3. Deion Jones [16 GS]: 84 tackles (9 stuffs), 10 coverages, 5 sacks. Rashaan Evans [16 GS]: 102 tackles (10 stuffs), 4 coverages, 2 sacks, 1 forced fumble, 2 recoveries.Jerome Baker [16 GS]: 103 tackles (12 stuffs), 4 coverages, 2 sacks, 2 forced fumbles, 1 recovery. -18 tackles, -1 stuff, +6 coverage, +3 sacks, -3 turnovers Anyone want to give me a first for both Evans and Baker? A single pick gets two for the price of one!
  4. Marcus Peters [16 GS]: 70 tackles, 41 coverages, 1 sack, 2 interceptions, 1 forced fumble. TBH 41 coverages from a CB who started all season is pretty bad.
  5. +1 We should also design and prepare an offensive and defensive playbook, and have those links submitted in the game threads, for voters to evaluate schemes and plays, and truly make an informed decision.
  6. Jerry Jeudy had two major drops that helped keep the Titans in the game. If he can clean those up he's going to be a good one, I had him as my #1 coming out, and I was also very high on Lamb.
  7. That was one of the most blatant forced manipulation of his vote if I've ever seen, and unbelievable backtracking to join the herd mentality.
  8. And that's why it's a small nitpick, because yes it wasn't including personnel changes and the coach can call to an extent, but it just seemed a bit off in the way I had read it, like the offense was reacting to the defense and not the other way around. I can understand the offense taking advantage of a single play before the defense adjusts, but beyond that, just seemed like 'we'll counter everything!' type of approach.
  9. Matt Ryan as your starting quarterback? I don't even need to read the gameplan (I did, and overall I voted Sacro).
  10. This one could come down to a coin flip for me, both team prepared. Home field gives the edge to Camden.
  11. I'm going with Seoul as I think overall they have the edge, but a small nitpick is discussing what they plan on coming out with and doing on offense based on defensive personnel. If I'm not mistaken, the offense must come out with a personnel before the defense adjusts. If the defense adjusts to the offense, you don't really get to dictate what you want to accomplish.
  12. And with that contract, he's what we call a negative asset.
  13. might be the most spineless response i've seen on these forums tbh
  14. BTW I updated my roster in the depth chart thread as well. And damn, I've put together something better than what I started with.
  15. but wait. What's funnier, the above being true, or him never arguing otherwise?
  16. If you change your vote I'll have a stroke.
×
×
  • Create New...