Jump to content

hitnhope

Members
  • Content count

    294
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

85 Starter
  1. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    I guess you really don't understand what quotes are, or how to use them. My post should be interpreted that this site has gone overboard on the Rodgers criticism. I read posts prior to mine criticizing how Rodgers will use players he hasn't yet played with. Fair characterization of Rodgers? 5 years ago he was the best player in the league. Last year he was about the 10th best, and paid more than that. Last year. I think the constant posts about that being all he ever will or can be again are premature. Just like they were when people were writing off brady and Brees a few years back in their down years. He was in a middling offense on a team with a middling defense in a new systems 1st year. We learn more this season. Hopefully we put some better talent around him to give him some help. You certainly do not see receivers running open all over the field the way KC or MO has. We see endless posts about him missing a receiver, pretending that we couldn't do that with every QB ever. There is no effort to silence any dissenting opinion. My retort would be that what is it about you that wants to silence any attempt to counter the constant criticism of a player who has had a good career and led his team to a 13-3 record last year. Teams with a middling defense and poor QB play don't win 13 games. Critical posts are about 20 - 1 on this site. We see you time and again blame AR for the SF loss. The defensive plan Pettine put on the field was the chief reason that we lost. They ran at will without any adjustments to change that. It better fits your agenda to post things like you have here that pin that loss on Rodgers. Its dishonest as can be, and you know enough football to know that is true. You haven't seen me complain about Turner, or Martinez either. Because the criticism of them is almost as unfair. For some reason only Rodgers bothers you, you seem to defend the others?
  2. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    Are you Norm? That would explain his supporting you.
  3. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    Why do you post things that simply aren't true? Do you like to lie? My take was the truth. Rodgers led a 13-3 team. I never made the statement that Packer fans are too harsh on Rodgers yet you put it in quotes. Are you dishonest or lacking the knowledge to know how quotes are used? Packer fans as a whole are probably too kind to Rodgers. This site is ridiculously the opposite. You are a big part of this. So lets get to the truth here. I said that Rodgers led the team to a 13-3 record. True or False I said that there are far more posts overly critical of Rodgers then defending. Read a few threads and answer the question - True or false. Try to be honest. Stop mischaracterizing other people and then slamming them. You make this site worse rather than better. Truly unfortunate because if you stopped trying to be a contrarian know it all you would have positive things to add to the forum. As is, you make it much tougher to read. The last page of this thread is exactly why. In no other place would anyone call me a Rodgers apologist. On this site it seems that has become the case because of the over the top BS thrown his way. He has deserved criticism at times these past couple years. He also has made some big plays and done some really good things. We don't see that on this site. -
  4. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    Do you have any thoughts regarding football? You post childish things like that above and then want people to take anything you say with a grain of salt. You defend AG who posts things in quotes that were never said. His post is dishonest as can be. He does that a lot and it seems people who don't know the game believe all of it. Half of what he says is fairly intelligent. the other half is misleading BS. Think about what you believe and support instead of going all in.
  5. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    I guess I made the idiocy worse. I apologize for that.
  6. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    One would never know from reading this site that AR led a 13-3 team. Him not having a great season is brought up numerous times every hour. People defending him are at about 1 in 20 at most. I posted the original thought after reading about 5 different threads in a row that had these critical posts. I would agree that he didn't outplay his contract. We don't need to see it in every other post. Every day. Sometimes fair and sometimes not even a little bit fair. I don't think many really know what bad QB play is based on this site. Every pass that isn't perfect leads to a string of posts.
  7. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    I largely agree. However there are a lot of teams with defenses better than the Packers that weren't able to get to 13-3. Reading this board, and the constant criticism would lead one to believe many think he now sucks. Like everyone on this board my hope is that with some added talent around him, and another year in the system we get the player back from earlier in his career.
  8. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    You do realize that Rodgers QB'd a 13-3 team last year. An NFL team without a dominating defense. No matter how lucky you are, you don't get to 13-3 in the NFL with poor QB play. Especially if that team doesn't have an exceptional defense. He isn't the player he was 5 years ago, but the constant crapping on a winning QB is curious.
  9. All In (mock inside)

    Not sure why people want OBJ. He would pout and become a problem when Adams gets more targets than he does. Seems to me he is more about marketing than results.
  10. Of the listed players, Jaylon Johnson. If available Isaiah Wilson or Prince Tega Wanogho
  11. Packerraymond Mock Finishing the Off-season V3

    No. But I also think Alexander plays bigger and is/was a better prospect. Alexander is/was faster and quicker. Our roster make up is different as well now vs when we drafted JA. I also like that King is on the bigger side of CB's , paired with Jaire. If you draft Gladney my assumption is that we move on from King after his contract is up. Not necessarily true, but more than likely.
  12. Packerraymond Mock Finishing the Off-season V3

    And he has a small build. I guess I needed to choose my words more carefully. Everyone just ready to argue. We had 3 pages of arguments about a small contract, and another on what defines a traditional vs running QB. Gladney is not a player I would want this year in the first round. Claypool isn't either for different reasons. And no - I don't need a listing of his combine performance.
  13. Packerraymond Mock Finishing the Off-season V3

    Not a fan of this one. I think Gladney is small. He may be listed at 5'10", but looks smaller than that. I think there are better options at WR than Claypool as well.
  14. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    Did you think Funchess woud be paying the Packers?
  15. Packers sign Devin Funchess

    Exactly. You pick best player available with premium picks. You still have to pay attention to salary cap and premium position while doing this. You fill gaps with the other picks. Forcing a pick into a position to try and fill gaps is how teams talent levels drop overall. This became TT problem with his last few drafts. He started drafting positions rather than BPA. The result showed in the overall talent level of our roster.
×