Jump to content

pacman5252

Members
  • Content count

    336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

38 Rookie
  1. You Are In Control. Who Replaces McCarthy?

    "He played bad openings"- Cleveland. I replied to a comment saying about him interviewing and throwing his name out for jobs he wasn't going to take. The same with the indy job
  2. You Are In Control. Who Replaces McCarthy?

    I think Flip is a terrible candidate. The Vikings have gotten worse with him with a better QB. His claim to fame is helping raise Carson Wentz (1 good season). Maybe if we were drafting a QB or had a first year guy, I'd buy into him more, but with a to be 36 year old AR, I don't think that is the route to go.
  3. You Are In Control. Who Replaces McCarthy?

    He's played the game with bad openings (Cleveland). That franchise until this year has been the worst run in the league (ironically since they hired Packers to run their front office). There is too much hate on McDaniels. He wasn't ready for a job when he was 33, 9 years ago. Think of how much you've grown in 9 years.
  4. You Are In Control. Who Replaces McCarthy?

    I know we want more creativity, but do you think Rodgers will buy in to a college coach that has never been a HC? Brohm was also drafted to compete with Rodgers at one point. How would that go over?
  5. You Are In Control. Who Replaces McCarthy?

    He was given too much control at 32. People learn from their mistakes. The fact is he is an offensive guru which is what we need, and we also need a guy who isn’t afraid to push AR either
  6. You Are In Control. Who Replaces McCarthy?

    I’d go with Josh McDaniels. He knows offense as well as anyone , knows what good cultures are like, amd how to work with egos. He failed in Denver when he had too much responsibility, which I don’t think would happen here with our personnel structure. I’m kind of against bringing in a young sexy college coach, or like Fillip. You’re getting married to Aaron Rodgers with this job (who would be more experienced and we can all agree can be full of himself). Although we need some new concepts to the O, AR needs to buy in or it won’t work.
  7. Week 11 GDT: GB @ Seattle TreeSloths

    This loss was a microcosm of the season- A few miscues (EQ not stopping on a route) AR over extending plays and not taking what is there Giving up on the ground A missed FG The D breaking at the end A couple Questionable calls It is frustrating because the talent is there and we are close
  8. The Kyler Fackrell Aplogy Thread

    I wanted to draft him, just because he graded athletically high. I’ll say I thought he was worthless after last year. Kyler, you are pretty solid and are worth a second deal. The 2016 class is looking pretty special between Clark, Martinez, and Fackrell. 2 maybe 2018 pro bowlers and a good starter. Best class in a long time
  9. Aaron Rodgers Depreciation Thread

    Is AR checking out of run plays all the time? It is frustrating. We’ve broken 30 1 time this year.
  10. Week 11 GDT: GB @ Seattle TreeSloths

    The only thing saving MM after this year is a hot streak. Thanks for the memories, but time for a change
  11. Week 11 GDT: GB @ Seattle TreeSloths

    Super disappointing game. Missed FG Bad timeouts Bad breaks (calls going against us) Bad decisions... D is gassed, out our best 2 DL and we don’t go for it on 4th and 2 with 1 to. AR missing open receivers (Jones on third). We’re ahead the majority of the second half, we have a good OL, Rb, and we run 4 times.... is it AR checking out or MM? Either way stupid. Sometimes you just have to run This loss sums up the year. Potential shown, mistakes made, ugh
  12. Week 11 GDT: GB @ Seattle TreeSloths

    We wouldn’t have gotten that Call reversed. It was close. Close goes to the O
  13. Week 11 GDT: GB @ Seattle TreeSloths

    Missed an easy pass to Jones. We don’t play great situationally this year
  14. Week 11 GDT: GB @ Seattle TreeSloths

    Kyler, I love you
  15. Week 11 GDT: GB @ Seattle TreeSloths

    If the ball is moving, how does he have control
×