
pacman5252
Members-
Content Count
2,021 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Considering how in we were "supposedly" at WR last year, I think we're discounting it as a fan base. We wanted Aiyuk last year (the motion "weapon" player that could have added another element and fix our return game). I wouldn't be surprised or disappointed if it is Toney, Amari Rodgers, or R Moore at 29.
-
It depends on the definition of fix. There is a scenario where the line is middle of the pack next year if -Cleveland makes the position change and is just replacement level -Cole starts and is just replacement level -Interior draft pick starts and is just average (or if somehow Dru makes a giant year 2 jump, but he isn't) Oneil is good, and Bradbury isn't bad (not good though). I could also see a scenario that losing Reiff (definition of average tackle) comes back to bite the team if Hill/Ezra don't improve
-
That isn't really a bad top 3, especially after the last few years. You can roll with those 3, maybe get some run from Hughes, a 4/5th rounder and Boyd as CB 4-6. A slot safety is also an interesting option. Someone like Elijah Molden or Jevon Holland in a scenario where the Vikes get back into R2 would cover a need and add flexibility
-
That really isn't that good considering that is 3 top 6 picks, granted none of those were Douglas' guys
-
Unless it is like microfractures, yes.
-
This would be boring but a really good draft. We need d front help and could use a OT as a hedge. With King back, I could see us just going mid round volume at CB especially with this class being deeper there (similar to Rb/wr a few years back). I really do like Wallace as a #2 type wr. The kid has swag and won’t have the MVS drops. From a roster planning standpoint we do need to develop a WR as well or the well will be dry in 2 years. The only thing it is missing is a flyer at rb in round 6.
-
Our drafts definitely were less than stellar. -2015 was a disaster. The best 2 players from that class are a backup QB, S, and WR -2016 was actually pretty good. Considering we picked late R1, Clark, Martinez, Lowry, and Fackrell is a pretty solid haul. 2 good starters and 2 rotation guys is normally a good draft (granted we moved on from Blake and Fack) -2017- Pretty bad... 1 plus RB, a bad starting CB, a backup RB
-
I agree Dean a bench/low end starter. I was more arguing that considering the dead cap implications and the fact we’d only save 3.3m, he’s worth keeping. We aren’t getting someone better for 3.3 or less.
-
Lowry played about 60% of snaps last year. He's not a bench player for us. If you think we should try to do better, I get it. The going rate for a second contract low end starter is 6M though right now. In addition, for context, we'd only save 3.3M from cutting Lowry. Montravius Adams got 2.5M.
-
I'm not super surprised seeing how the market unfolded. He got the prove it Nick Perry deal. I'm not a King fan, but at least he's not UDFA level bad.
-
Surprised Monty got more than the vet minimum. He did have some flashes on ocassion, just would get hurt
-
I wouldn't be surprised to see PP playing some type of hybrid nickel/safety like a Charles Woodson, Minkah, or Honey Badger. Either way the D is going to have a lot more teeth this next year. 3 better DL, year 2 corners, and PP. The only loss being Harris.
-
85% no, a 2 is a lot to give up for a 1 year deal and limited sample size. Good TEs are scare though.
-
Jusz is probably one of the most unique players in the nfl. He actually is a viable receiving option. He’s why we drafted Degura
-
He’d need a 3rd contract to do it. He’s like 5k rushing and 45 tds away. The last 2 years he’s averaging 1089 and 12.5.