Jump to content

Brian23

Veteran Members
  • Posts

    8,195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Brian23's Achievements

160

Reputation

  1. But they won't though. The article has no implications of Snyder, and really only implicates Allen as the reason for this happening. He's got full plausible deniability in this, and he can just point to all the perpetrators being removed. The reason the Owner's won't remove him, even if they hate him, is because they don't want their head to be on the chopping block next. If you can be removed because stuff happened you weren't aware of, then a lot of these owners could be removed eventually.
  2. Oh, I guarantee he knew about it. I bet he partook in those old boy discussions, but you have to prove it happened. There's zero proof here. All the people named are no longer with the team.
  3. I just don't see it. This isn't comparable to Richardson, because Richardson was the one making comments. This is essentially the Robert Kraft story. An embarassment, but one they'll sweep under the rug. Don't get me wrong, I wanna be wrong but they'll just say they fired all those involved and are bettering themselves internally. Snyder never heard about it, it's all Allen's fault, etc. etc.
  4. So, I get this is awful and bad, but this is not gonna get Dan Snyder removed from ownership. He's not named, and the people who were are all gone. Like...this is a dud that won't be talked about in a few days.
  5. It's why I imagine anything on the field is to do with betting on the game. Beyond the lack of "good calls" from Ref's over the years, I just can't imagine getting away with bribing ref's like that. The NFL and the Ref's are far to incestual for someone else to not have picked it up and reported it. I can easily imagine, with Jay Gruden's lackadaisical approach, point-shaving or trying to hit the over/under fairly often. It'd explain an awful lot of the weird ways the team would play for him.
  6. The rumor, from above that all the twitter/discord heads are using, is that Dan was paying off Refs. I think it's far more likely they were betting on games, point-shaving. I just can't imagine ref betting being something the NFL doesn't find out about. The Ref's are such a small group of people, it's not as if they're not around every team or league officials often. It also makes no sense with how **** we've been.
  7. Are we allowed to post "leaks"? At this point, the meme's are all we've got...
  8. Any billionaire is losing "slave labor" at some level, hell you can't support the NFL if that's what you're held up on. At this point, I'd just take a rich owner, who's willing to spend, and roll the dice. As long as we don't get a Mike Brown
  9. The team is declining to comment on the retirement of their 16 year "voice of the team". Some ****'s about to drop, I just hope it lands on Snyder enough to force him out.
  10. Knew it was coming, still figure it probably needed to happen, still gutted. Then again, the Skins have been **** my entire 30 years of life so maybe the new name will bring better luck.
×
×
  • Create New...