Jump to content

William Lee

Members
  • Content count

    211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

18 Prospect
  1. Who else could score 351 in 14 games with Troy Brown as top WR? Do you really expect a QB to lead winning drive in SB with Troy Brown? You know Belichick's defense has a habit of collapse in later 4th quarter. To put that into perspective, Aaron Rodgers couldn't score 380 when he didn't have Jordy Nelson.
  2. Did you see the screen shots of those play designs? Can you remember in detail 3 of them? Versatility needs intelligence, it is not like an OC puts a design in front of a QB, then the QB can play, otherwise every team would have hired an army of OC. How do you think Dan Marino turned Don Shula and Jimmy Johnson to idiots? Also, as showed in my 2nd post on first page, lot of designs work because of Brady: Throw the balls so quick that when defenders realize who his targets are, it is already too late. Without this ability, a QB simply can't depend on dink n dunk to score enough, as any hiccup may kill the drive.
  3. Pat's won ALL SB they played in when Brady played dink n dunk, and lost ALL three when Brady didn't. Dink n dunk is the key reason that #1, Pats don't have to overpay WR, #2, Pats don't need solid running games, #3, Pats don't need to overpay O line, #4, Pats played time consuming offense when against top offense. Dink n dunk is fundamentally different from any other offense system in that a completed pass doesn't give you first down. No other QB in NFL history was able to depend on dink n dunk to score enough. (read my second post on first page), most of them can't even depend on WCO to score enough. So it is utterly clueless to claim "it is Belichick's", as it is simply impossible that a (defense) coach could come up such marvelous scheme overnight, annnnnd he doesn't even have to talk to his QB and receivers.
  4. Belichick almost never talk to his offense on sidelines, meaning the system must be quite simple if it is Belichick's, as Brady was able to command it in his first year as starter, including lot of Pats receivers in last 18 years, even some just join in. That, makes other QB and coaches idiots
  5. Meaning every (good) QB should be able to learn Pats system if it is Belichick's. Or you mean no other QB can understand Belichick's terminology, after so many years? the The offense in 2007 shared the same terminology with the ones before?
  6. So here we go again: Between 2001 and 2006, Brady was able to score 380 pts without a top tier WR, sometimes not even with a 2nd tier WR. Now with better receivers, more experience and rule changes, he is able to score 440. What did Belichick do to improve his offense before 2007? Given that Belichick almost never talk to his offense on sidelines, why do you people believe that QB like Peyton, Brees and Rodgers are idiots, like they are not even as smart as Danny Amendola?
  7. If you look at paper, yes, not much difference. Look the ways they play, well, huge difference. The impact in playoffs is even bigger, as good defense will take away your big plays. Brady is GOAT because football is a team sport. Who else can consistently turn average WR into playmakers? who else can turn short n slow WR into playmakers? Who can score 41 and 31 pts in playoff without deep threats? Who else can stay on field for 36 min and 39 min so to help his defense? Who can get rid of the balls so quickly that makes opponent pass rush completely irrelevant so to help his O-line? ONLY Brady. Those, are what make Belichick looks like a genius.
  8. OK, Aaron Rodgers will turn Matt LaFleur into next idiot

    Having the gut to watch the videos? I guess not. from 5:20 to 6:00, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssVi7Kqs05w@10:05, watch WR #33 , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gSh8IiRBZ4&t=612s The second one was typical James White move. You know what is pathetic about this? Rodgers didn't look at other directions initially, he looked at the exact big space #33 was about to run to.
  9. OK, Aaron Rodgers will turn Matt LaFleur into next idiot

    from 5:20 to 6:00, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssVi7Kqs05w@10:05, watch WR #33 , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gSh8IiRBZ4&t=612s Belichick would become an idiot with Rodgers; McCarthy would be a genius with Brady.
  10. In this play at 6:23, Brady would have got 1st down because he anticipates weak spots, so he could have thrown 1/10th or 2/10th of a second quicker. If it was Brady, there would be lot of fans who would claim "it is Belichick". In this play, at10:05, watch WR #33, typical James White move, Brady would have got 1st down easily. If it was Brady, there would be lot of fans who would claim "it is Belichick".
  11. I would stop you from implying Peyton, Brees and Rodgers are idiots, as you believe they could not even understand the secrets of an offense system as Pats receivers did.
  12. The problem is "not always". The magic wand didn't exist until after 2014 season. Before 2007, Brady already did something unprecedent.
  13. SBLIII, Some people don't care about the level of supporting casts, and the right way to win. Like what Brady did between 2001 and 2006 will not impress them, though no QB could have done that with the ****ty squad Belichick gave to Brady. What is really funny is that Belichick doesn't even talk to his offense, they still insist it is Belichick's system. How did Belichick put those receivers at right positions at right time without guiding them on sidelines? It is like claiming that once under Belichick's magic wand,a receiver immediately becomes smarter than Peyton and Rodgers.
  14. I don't judge a QB by how entertaining his playing style is.
  15. Read my first and 2nd posts on first page.
×