Jump to content

Rolni

Veteran Members
  • Content Count

    4,230
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rolni

  1. It will be interesting to see how much of a factor was PG and his scheme. Ferrell had to watch for the run IMO and in the college he just rushed and then reacted if there was a run play...IM just guessing here...
  2. Vic said lots of inaccurate stuff lately IMO. I mean sure, the writing is on the wall, they want him to start and to develope into a quality starter, but that's it. I doubt they will force him into a starting position if Martin looks clearly better. They must know that Carr needs a steady OL, especially in the middle... Andre can pick up an injury along they way, so the faces are saved and still the best OC starts. I'm not saying this will happen, I just saying that Vic knows as much as we do IMO...
  3. Bradley doesn't use that SAM/SLB role like they did in Seattle. There will be basically 2 SLB/SAM player/role IMO. When the SLB is a classic LB and have cover duties and when the SLB is the 3-4OLB type pass rusher, edge container. Let's call the first one SLB and the second one SAM. At SLB Nicholas Morrow will be the player and will be used similarly to White With the Chargers. At SAM Crosby, Koonce and even Yannick will get his chance IMO and their role will be the Melvin Gordon, Nwosu role. 4-3 base will be with SLB and from that when we shift to 4-3 under we wi
  4. Don't forget that Ferrell will play DT in nickel and dime packages a lot. We are not thin at DT.
  5. Richie hasn't played RG in 11 years or something like that. I would definately keep him at LG to help Andre as much as possible. When/if he goes down Simpson should be able to step in his place. I would put Good at RG to be a veteran next to Leatherwood and also Andre...
  6. I think Drake's arrival is what makes Richard expendable and also that is what could open the door for a non pass cathing, power RB as a 3rd RB.
  7. Hayward could play some as NCB, however he played mostly on the outside. He played more NCB, when Harris went down... I think Arnette is better suited to play NCB, then Hayward. I can see a scenario where Mullen and Arnette starts outside and when we switch to nickel formation Hayward comes in as an outside CB and Arnette slides inside as NCB. I'm not sure I want to train and use Anrette in multiple positions, with that being said the NCB in Bradley's scheme is a realtively easy job, so he could do that on paper. Zone cover, facing the QB...
  8. Yeah well, before the draft Mayock talked up that Smith guy at RT...
  9. Yeah you can do that easily. Here me out: Nassib was a solid rotational player before he signed with us. He got too much money and a badly structured deal from us. He struggled in PG's scheme like almost every D player on the team. The staff had a chance to cut him before his guarantees kick in this year, but they kept him around. Bradley was already on board when they kept him. I think they view him as a solid depth guy, who could help on the edge and maybe inside a little. I think we should give him the benefit of doubt in the new scheme. I
  10. We don't need another veteran DL guy IMO and definately don't need a DE IMO. We have Ferrell, Crosby and Koonce whom are promising young draft picks, who need to show what they can do in the new scheme or in the NFL. We have Ngakue who is a great scheme fit and a proven veteran. We have Nassib, who is a solid NFL depth player, we need to see what he can do in this scheme. This should be enough and maybe already a bit too crowded. These guys need reps to show up. I would pass on Ingram, can't really see where and when we use him...
  11. He born to be a Raider with that name, size, speed.
  12. I think this is a pretty bad pick! They could have selected Darrisaw or even Jenkins ahead of him easily. They could have traded back for anything, since noone would have select Alex before them. With that said he could develope into a solid RT for us. I would expect a brutal first year like Kolton Miller had and then steady developement. If there is no developement after year 2 he could kick inside to OG and be solid there. This move is again a testament to Gruden's job security IMO. He doesn't care what the media, the fans think and he knows that Mark Davis l
  13. 17 - Darrisaw would have been my pick for sure
  14. 1. Darrisaw 2. Jenkins 3. JOK It is suprising to me that Jenkins and JOK fell out of the 1st. I guess Jenkins is viewed as an OG with his short arms and JOK is viewed as a tweener
  15. I was thinking this before read that Mayock already said day 1 starting RT. Still could happen if Brown is there at our 3rd rounders...
  16. This or get lucky and take Grant at 48
  17. Where can I sign up for this? Really like the hole mock. Darrisaw is a really clean OT prospect IMO, only question would be the switch to the right side. Holland could be a solid starter for us. Abedo might be the only early pick I switch, but without the hole tracker I can't say for sure, he would be a good system fit, so could live with him. McNeil could be Hankins replacement in '22 and good depth in '21, however that DT spot will be crowded. Jaimes as OG would make sense! Snowden would need a big offseason to stick around, but could be a solid PS candida
  18. CWood said in an interview that he didn't reach out, but that is not a problem and he would help gladly when/if he reaches out
  19. Absolutely no! Gruden and Carr not using WRs enough to go and grab another 1st rounder IMO. Waller is our #1 receiver. Ruggs, Edwards needs to step up and with Renfrow and Moreau also on board we could have a trully strong receiver group and then we still have depth too. No need for another WR IMO and definately no need for a high draft pick in this scheme, team...
×
×
  • Create New...