Chili Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Just now, Packerraymond said: You can't rule out Amish IMO. Amish and Mormon are not the same people?!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 14 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: You can't rule out Amish IMO. Any pictures of him wearing something with buttons? I assume there are some in the suit he's wearing for the picture on page 1, but they aren't shown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebpackfan Posted April 28, 2018 Share Posted April 28, 2018 This is the sort of hard-hitting analysis I come to FF for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWhitehurst Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 I really wondered at the time why they picked Cole Madison, WSU over Tyrell Crosby, Oregon, who went 15 picks later. I guess I'm more surprised that Crosby went that late. But the Packers must see what I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 On 4/28/2018 at 12:57 PM, jfinley88 said: hell yeah baby Ya'll are nuts. He isn't Sitton. He isn't Bakh. He's what the offspring would look like if Sitton had a child with Tauscher. Good luck trying to sleep with that image in your head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 BTW...loved the pick. He reminds me of Tauscher. Not quite strong enough, big, quick feet. I almost expect this kid to start the season at Right Tackle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 30 minutes ago, vegas492 said: Ya'll are nuts. He isn't Sitton. He isn't Bakh. He's what the offspring would look like if Sitton had a child with Tauscher. Good luck trying to sleep with that image in your head. Thanks. I hate you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 16 hours ago, DWhitehurst said: I really wondered at the time why they picked Cole Madison, WSU over Tyrell Crosby, Oregon, who went 15 picks later. I guess I'm more surprised that Crosby went that late. But the Packers must see what I don't. Isn't Crosby purely a guard? I think he was very fit-specific and had some consistently issues in college. More of a mauler type which has never been GB's style. Madison is your TJ Lang type of player who played tackle in college and will slide inside in the NFL but can also play tackle if needed. This was one of my favorite picks of the draft. Perfect Packer player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 He needs a better number than 61. That is a long snappers number. Has there ever been a decent Packer offensive lineman who wore #61? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green machine Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 1 hour ago, Golfman said: He needs a better number than 61. That is a long snappers number. Has there ever been a decent Packer offensive lineman who wore #61? He took his college number of 61. Perhaps he will be the one decent OL to wear that number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 On 4/30/2018 at 12:17 PM, packfanfb said: Isn't Crosby purely a guard? I think he was very fit-specific and had some consistently issues in college. More of a mauler type which has never been GB's style. Madison is your TJ Lang type of player who played tackle in college and will slide inside in the NFL but can also play tackle if needed. This was one of my favorite picks of the draft. Perfect Packer player. Don't quote me on this one, but I believe Oregon OL are hard to project to the next level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 3 hours ago, CWood21 said: Don't quote me on this one, but I believe Oregon OL are hard to project to the next level. Plus is stiffer and already has a significant foot injury on his injury report. 300+ pounders who have already broken bones in their foot are scary as hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 3 hours ago, CWood21 said: Don't quote me on this one, but I believe Oregon OL are hard to project to the next level. No wonder I'm confused. You're commenting about Crosby - whereas I was thinking it was about Cole Madison. I was wondering how Oregon played into it. Well at least I can delete my thoughts that it was Madison who had the foot injury. As Forrest would say: "One good thing". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted May 6, 2018 Share Posted May 6, 2018 On 4/30/2018 at 1:17 PM, packfanfb said: Isn't Crosby purely a guard? I think he was very fit-specific and had some consistently issues in college. More of a mauler type which has never been GB's style. Madison is your TJ Lang type of player who played tackle in college and will slide inside in the NFL but can also play tackle if needed. This was one of my favorite picks of the draft. Perfect Packer player. I believe Crosby played T in college and it may have been LT. Many projected him as a T in the NFL. The Lions want to slide him inside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.