Johnny Nix Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Which position would you rather have a stacked group at? Which do you think has the most value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Cornerback because defense still wins championships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xmad Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 You can have garbage WRs and still move the ball, if you have garbage CBs you're gonna give up a **** load of 3rd downs and lose TOP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BleedTheClock Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 CB for sure. The things you can do on defense with 4-5 great cover guys is insane. Also, an ineffective CB will harm your team significantly more than an ineffective WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 Quality CBs can mask any deficiency you have on defense, whether it be a weak pass rush, poor containment on the run game, etc. I don't think quality WRs can cover up a poor OL or lack of a run game, however. This being said - if you have a dominant 1-4 at WR, you're going to win some games in an exciting fashion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gnat Posted August 10, 2017 Share Posted August 10, 2017 CB's pretty easily. While having scrubs at WR would be bad, your question asks about depth. The Vikings don't have any amazing receivers (or at least not perceived to be as good as some groups), but because they have a couple of decent guys, they can still move the ball. Remove the CB depth that the Vikings have, wouldn't matter how good their LB's or DL are, they would get torched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.