BayRaider Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 I think the only WRs off the board by your guy’s picks might be Metcalf at 22 and Harry at 34. AJ Brown would be good value cause no way he gets past the Giants at 37. This is also the perfect draft to double dip WRs in the 2nd/3rd. Ridley, McLaurin, some quality guys should be there in the early 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 39 minutes ago, BayRaider said: I think the only WRs off the board by your guy’s picks might be Metcalf at 22 and Harry at 34. AJ Brown would be good value cause no way he gets past the Giants at 37. This is also the perfect draft to double dip WRs in the 2nd/3rd. Ridley, McLaurin, some quality guys should be there in the early 3rd. I actually don't hate the double dip idea at receiver for us this year, but I think I'm generally the lowest on our receivers out of anyone in here, so that tracks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Chrissooner49er said: I think there would be more than that. I am certain you were thinking of me as one. Because I would be very disappointed. Just would not make sense to me. Too many bodies, too too many...... You're the immediate one, of course, because you've been the most outspoken. I don't think you'd be the only one though for sure. Honestly, if we go Williams, I expect armstead or Thomas gone the next day, possibly. Similar to Trent brown last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N4L Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 3 hours ago, Melbourne 9er said: I can't see us staying at #36 at all. We only have 6 picks and the 2nd and 3rd rounds will be full of WR, Secondary and IOL prospects all the way through. We should be looking at trading #36 for 2+3 at least, if not another pick in the 2020 draft. I would be rapt if we could get a low 2nd rounder and a 2020 2nd rounder. It would essentially be trading down in the 2nd round of a deep draft for Dee Ford. I am on board with this. It makes a lot of sense. I think it's why we would love to move from #2 to #4/5/6/7 in the first I will say though our MO has been to trade up to get 'our guy'. I have a hard time seeing us trade down in the second because I think these first two picks are going to be penciled in as immediate starters. If a team wants to move up a few spots and give us a third? That is something we would do. I have a hard time seeing us move back the 10+ spots it would take to get the haul you are talking about. It just hasn't been the way weve operated tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sherm Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 10 hours ago, Chrissooner49er said: I think there would be more than that. I am certain you were thinking of me as one. Because I would be very disappointed. Just would not make sense to me. Too many bodies, too too many...... Count me in...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 Very intriguing guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 Quote Upcoming known 49ers visits: Josh Allen, outside linebacker A.J. Brown, wide receiver Nick Bosa, defensive end Rashan Gary, defensive end Deebo Samuel, wide receiver Montez Sweat, defensive end Quinnen Williams, defensive tackle These are official visits, I believe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fureys49ers Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 59 minutes ago, Forge said: These are official visits, I believe Like that list a lot other than Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldman9er Posted March 30, 2019 Share Posted March 30, 2019 https://twitter.com/PFF_College https://twitter.com/PFF_College Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melbourne 9er Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 8 hours ago, oldman9er said: https://twitter.com/PFF_College https://twitter.com/PFF_College Come on. We have to get a Poindexter to live in Silicon Valley don't we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NFLExpert49 Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 Anybody want to explain the logic in taking Quinnen Williams when the 49ers wouldn't even play Solomon Thomas at DT? You take a guy who is a pure interior d-lineman 3rd overall, try to make him an edge rusher, and it predictably flops...and then you take another interior d-lineman? Are they going to play Williams at Leo too? Even if you think Willliams is a better prospect than Thomas was, it just looks ridiculous to take another 3 technique-type and then say, "oh, with HIM we'll put him inside next to Buckner." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burlow Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 48 minutes ago, NFLExpert49 said: Anybody want to explain the logic in taking Quinnen Williams when the 49ers wouldn't even play Solomon Thomas at DT? You take a guy who is a pure interior d-lineman 3rd overall, try to make him an edge rusher, and it predictably flops...and then you take another interior d-lineman? Are they going to play Williams at Leo too? Even if you think Willliams is a better prospect than Thomas was, it just looks ridiculous to take another 3 technique-type and then say, "oh, with HIM we'll put him inside next to Buckner." We should have traded that #2 pick for OBJ, cant believe we did not pursue that trade at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John232 Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 15 minutes ago, burlow said: We should have traded that #2 pick for OBJ, cant believe we did not pursue that trade at all. Does John Lynch even know what a pick is? or a phone? or a facebook? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burlow Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 47 minutes ago, John232 said: Does John Lynch even know what a pick is? or a phone? or a facebook? Lynch should not be a GM in this era, the time has passed him by. He does not understand electronic communication and often makes trades by intimidation, other GM's are known to cower in fear as he hurtles towards them in a dead sprint. It is good to have a feared GM but when his idea of communication is to etch words on stone and tie them to large birds of flight the time has passed them by. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted March 31, 2019 Share Posted March 31, 2019 2 hours ago, NFLExpert49 said: Anybody want to explain the logic in taking Quinnen Williams when the 49ers wouldn't even play Solomon Thomas at DT? You take a guy who is a pure interior d-lineman 3rd overall, try to make him an edge rusher, and it predictably flops...and then you take another interior d-lineman? Are they going to play Williams at Leo too? Even if you think Willliams is a better prospect than Thomas was, it just looks ridiculous to take another 3 technique-type and then say, "oh, with HIM we'll put him inside next to Buckner." I still think Bosa is the pick. If the cards take Bosa, it gets interesting. I think Williams is a phenomenal prospect. He would play the one tech in base, and rush the passer on passing situations from the interior with Buck. If you value interior pressure more than edge pressure, that would also make sense to go over Bosa. Thomas is a sunk cost. He should not have any bearing on the selection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.