RuskieTitan Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Well I think Ted has submitted for both scenarios, so Nacho will be able to tag with how the rules are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Just now, RuskieTitan said: And if there's proof and shown, as I've previously mentioned, I'm entirely willing to admit I am wrong. But bringing shoe examples and sob stories of how you wish you had done things differently just comes off as "I wasnt thorough in understanding and others should have to conform". Like I said, neither of us are demanding lol. Might seem that way somehow(not exactly sure how, but maybe its because you're the outsider looking in). And for me I still have time to tag Cunningham if I want to if the rules are as such. Bucs obviously would have preferred to do things differently... but I cant imagine hes too upset that he got a top 3 rb out of the ordeal. Certainly not sobbing as you're implying. We're both just saying we believed the rules to be as such because we believe we remember Nacho saying so.. and if we're wrong in that regard then darn, kinda wish we didn't assume that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrenaline_Flux Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Fine. We will all compromise with JJ Watt costing just 1 tag heading forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Adrenaline_Flux said: Fine. We will all compromise with JJ Watt costing just 1 tag heading forward. You never got around to accepting my trade love bug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Keep in mind this just for Taco Bowl XIV. Another chance to host the next Taco Bowl will be available at the end of next season. Never happened Nacho smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 I traded for a top three RB possibly not fully understanding how to manipulate tags to keep as many guys as possible. God dammit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 bucsfan333 wrote: Would the rookie scale be limited to two (preferably the two "least expensive" keepers) so it's not abused? That way someone can't tank with a rookie QB and and keep him for a tag, while keeping two other rookies at the same time. You'd pay the four tags for the QB but pay one tag for the other two. I figure limiting it would prevent the possibility of someone abusing it to keep an exorbitant amount of guys, so we don't see even more tanking. I don't want the league to become even less competitive. I suppose I could limit it to two, like the PS keeper rule. Of course, in order to truly abuse this, someone would have to be in a position where they have several really good rookies, which I'm not convinced would be easy. I actually don't see the harm in letting it be unrestricted... we are talking about rookies, after all. Even after NFL season one, its very rare for a rookie to have elite attributes. I don't quite see the advantage in "Tanking with a rookie QB" unless that rookie QB is worth keeping in the first place.. In which case, are you truly tanking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=588288&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=210 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 @Gmen4ev, those are just words, bruh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 1 minute ago, bucsfan333 said: @Gmen4ev, those are just words, bruh. All words are made up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 "After much internal debate, I decided to go forward with a modified version of the Rookie concept I had in mind earlier. Instead of making all rookies 1-tag keeper status, I decided to change "Practice Squad Players" to "Practice Squad or Rookies". The rule of no more than two players who played a game in the previous year will still apply, however. So if you play three rookies for 16 games each, you'd only be able to keep two for 1 tag. Furthermore, you wouldn't be able to keep any practice squad players for a single tag who played in a game. Basically the only difference is rookies can maintain "practice squad" eligibility despite starting all 16 games, while veterans have the old max of 7. If that is confusing to anyone, have questions, or concerns, let me know. I tried to take what everyone said into consideration here, and I think this will be a positive change moving forward."http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=588288&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=375 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Ramster Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Yeah there’s no way Osemele should cost 3 tags Nacho we want answers! I’ll change my keepers if that’s the case. Think trade abd draft resets the prices Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 2 minutes ago, El ramster said: Yeah there’s no way Osemele should cost 3 tags Nacho we want answers! I’ll change my keepers if that’s the case. Think trade abd draft resets the prices I agree with you in this case. You've played him at guard for the last two seasons. That's a two tag keeper. The rule is stupid. However, the rule is easier for everyone to follow and uphold without making exceptions. We all already adhere to it. And changing it would make tag manipulation even easier. Blame Sabo, in my opinion. Or draft guys and play them out of position like Gmen (Kerrigan) and Pwn (Bennett) have, so you can keep good players but get less out of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 eyeball emoji Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waffles7 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Southview Saints & Iowa Jagwads have agreed to terms...... Iowa Jagwads send: WR- Amari Cooper OLB- T.J. Watt 1 Keeper Tag Southview Saints send: S16 4th Round Pick S17 2nd Round Pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.