pwny Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 Who did you come away from this first preseason game thinking they just didn’t live up to the hype? Who hurt their chances at the final roster? Who made too many mistakes? Who looked invisible when they had a chance to shine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 Most disappointing thing is Patriots TV reminding me of how much better our logo used to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrenaline_Flux Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 13 hours ago, Tugboat said: Most disappointing thing is Patriots TV reminding me of how much better our logo used to be. Really? I definitely think the current logo is a huge upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 Never saw any of it, counting on you guys to tell me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Buzz Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 Myles jack showed flashes but missed a few tackles and bad angles...going to be a lot of ups and downs in the early going. Fowler (even though PFF gave him a great pass rush grade) was mostly invisible pass rush wise. Had a couple ok rushes. Josh Wells at RT wasnt good. Cam was good at LT as far as pass pro goes, ok at times during run pro but also got beat bad a few times I saw. CB depth wasnt as good as I hoped. Top 3 were out but I thought Johnson, Patmon, etc. steuggled a bit. Maybe bring in more competition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted August 12, 2017 Author Share Posted August 12, 2017 Yeesh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrenaline_Flux Posted August 12, 2017 Share Posted August 12, 2017 A lot of it was second and third team guys, iirc. LB depth doesn't look great and the DB depth guys seem to struggle wrapping up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwny Posted August 13, 2017 Author Share Posted August 13, 2017 9 hours ago, Adrenaline_Flux said: A lot of it was second and third team guys, iirc. LB depth doesn't look great and the DB depth guys seem to struggle wrapping up. Seems to always be the case with this team though. Poor fundamentals have haunted us for quite some time. I’d also hope a lot of it was second a third team guys. The first team didn’t play too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 On 8/11/2017 at 1:15 PM, Adrenaline_Flux said: Really? I definitely think the current logo is a huge upgrade. I still really just don't much care for it. Much prefer the old one. It was a lot less cheesy. Both in the sense that it looked a lot less like the Cheetos cat, and also in the sense that i hate logos with too much detail or attempted cartoon-like fidelity to real things. It just looks cheap to me. The new logo does fit in with the shield thing better tho. I'll give it that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tugboat Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 3 hours ago, iPwn said: Seems to always be the case with this team though. Poor fundamentals have haunted us for quite some time. I’d also hope a lot of it was second a third team guys. The first team didn’t play too much. Problem is, another thing that's haunted this team for quite some time has been injuries. Which means 2nd and 3rd team guys will be playing actual games. So if they suck, that'd bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.