Jaegybomb Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 9 hours ago, Packerraymond said: Also can you communicate on here without constantly swearing? It's really not hard. I've never been good at your passive aggressive ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaegybomb Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 10 hours ago, Packerraymond said: everything I said was right. No you are lying about what I said once again with your constant strawman bull****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 12 hours ago, Jaegybomb said: You might be the most reductive baby on these forums. Here’s a warning for personal attacks. If you can’t post in a calm manner I suggest logging off and cooling down. The swear filter isn’t in place for you to continue to swear. Remember there are younger posters here that read there forums too. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubz41 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 I get it that some can understand the reasons behind letting Jordy go and some thought he was worth keeping, albeit at a reduce Cap number. But if you read some of the lower points of this thread (which is Graham and the TE alignment) The most aggressive posts keep touting Jordy's 2016 season.....well if we were getting 2016 version of Jordy I think we all would agree that we keep him, BUT that was two years ago! Watching him last season, no matter who the QB was, he looked slower and he did baseball slide a LOT more. Even in his first 5 games. Both sides have exhausted their arguments and are only repeating themselves. It's not 2016 and will we keep 4 TEs now so MM can run his 12 personnel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaegybomb Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 5 hours ago, CWood21 said: Here’s a warning for personal attacks. If you can’t post in a calm manner I suggest logging off and cooling down. The swear filter isn’t in place for you to continue to swear. Remember there are younger posters here that read there forums too. Thanks. My bad. Is there any way you could allow users to put mods on the ignore list? It won't let me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 4 hours ago, Dubz41 said: It's not 2016 and will we keep 4 TEs now so MM can run his 12 personnel? Do we normally keep 4 TE's? Seems like alot - unless you're including the PS. I think Graham, Kendricks & Lewis are roster locks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 3 minutes ago, Leader said: Do we normally keep 4 TE's? Seems like alot - unless you're including the PS. I think Graham, Kendricks & Lewis are roster locks. If anything, assuming we don't add a vet WR, you'd think GB will go heavy at WR versus TE. GB will do everything they can to hold onto those rookie WRs whereas they have nothing invested in TE outside of the big 3. Byrd is the closest but it's not like he's a draft pick. If anything, a great camp by Byrd probably means "cya" to Kendricks, but I doubt that'll happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 4 minutes ago, packfanfb said: If anything, assuming we don't add a vet WR, you'd think GB will go heavy at WR versus TE. GB will do everything they can to hold onto those rookie WRs Agree with this. I dont think we'll add a vet WR unless the rookies prove themselves unworthy. Otherwise, I think they represent an investment in the future. Possible 2018 production - but 2019 at latest. Tall....fast.....tall.....fast.....tall.....fast...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGreatZepp Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 28 minutes ago, Leader said: Agree with this. I dont think we'll add a vet WR unless the rookies prove themselves unworthy. Otherwise, I think they represent an investment in the future. Possible 2018 production - but 2019 at latest. Tall....fast.....tall.....fast.....tall.....fast...... Every time I see someone talk about measurables at wide receiver I think of Troy Williamson... so much more than speed and height to the position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cakeshoppe Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 58 minutes ago, Leader said: Do we normally keep 4 TE's? Seems like alot - unless you're including the PS. I think Graham, Kendricks & Lewis are roster locks. TE4 is only making the team for ST value. Especially if they have PS eligibility. They’re competing against FB and LB depth guys at those ST spots usually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 2 hours ago, Jaegybomb said: My bad. Is there any way you could allow users to put mods on the ignore list? It won't let me. No. Webby doesn't want posters being able to ignore moderators. You'll just have to ignore them the old fashioned way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 1 hour ago, TheGreatZepp said: Every time I see someone talk about measurables at wide receiver I think of Troy Williamson... so much more than speed and height to the position You mean there are small WRs in the NFL that are productive? Noooooooooooooooo....it cant be! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted May 30, 2018 Author Share Posted May 30, 2018 14 minutes ago, CWood21 said: No. Webby doesn't want posters being able to ignore moderators. You'll just have to ignore them the old fashioned way. I predict a long and fruitful posting car for this dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaegybomb Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 Me? I go back to the 2012 espn draft comment section with Wood, Norm and co. I just don't take kindly to mods calling their forum base overly sensitive idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaegybomb Posted May 30, 2018 Share Posted May 30, 2018 When you are forcing users to see their responses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.