candyman93 Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 They have to win before Carson gets paid. That’s their window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiwibrown Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 2 hours ago, BleedTheClock said: Ok it has a 3% chance of happening. Ill go 15% If things go real well, he might take the cool aid to build the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas5737 Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 22 hours ago, ninjapirate said: How many super bowls does a team need to win to be a dynasty? 3? If so let's bring up this potential talk after they win a second if they ever do. Or at least wait until they have consecutive winning seasons. To be a true Dynasty I'd say 3 in a row, a dynasty traditionally doesn't have an interruption. As far as sports dynasties it's whatever you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 16 minutes ago, Thomas5737 said: Or at least wait until they have consecutive winning seasons. To be a true Dynasty I'd say 3 in a row, a dynasty traditionally doesn't have an interruption. As far as sports dynasties it's whatever you want. I think 3 in a row is rough. I think 3 in 5 years is a dynasty especially in the NFL where winning 2 in 10 year is still almost impossible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 4 minutes ago, JaguarCrazy2832 said: I think 3 in a row is rough. I think 3 in 5 years is a dynasty especially in the NFL where winning 2 in 10 year is still almost impossible Agreed i think 3 in 5 is a good bar anything short of that and you weren't a dynasty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heinz D. Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 24 minutes ago, Thomas5737 said: Or at least wait until they have consecutive winning seasons. To be a true Dynasty I'd say 3 in a row, a dynasty traditionally doesn't have an interruption. As far as sports dynasties it's whatever you want. Three what in a row? Division titles? You certainly don't mean Super Bowls? 2 minutes ago, ninjapirate said: Agreed i think 3 in 5 is a good bar anything short of that and you weren't a dynasty. That's a pretty high bar. Especially in this day and age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 1 minute ago, Heinz D. said: Three what in a row? Division titles? You certainly don't mean Super Bowls? That's a pretty high bar. Especially in this day and age. dynasty is a strong word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heinz D. Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 1 minute ago, ninjapirate said: dynasty is a strong word I suppose. But if you don't approach it relatively, there may not really be "dynasties" any more, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjapirate Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 Just now, Heinz D. said: I suppose. But if you don't approach it relatively, there may not really be "dynasties" any more, though. and what would be the negative to that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 Categorizing a team as a Dynasty is an interesting concept. I don't think it's enough to win something arbitrary like 3 out of 5. The Giants won 3 world series in 5 years, but I don't know many that categorize that team as a "Dynasty". The two years in between they missed the playoffs altogether, and some of those years they didn't even win their own division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TENINCH Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 Right now the NFC is too strong for any dynasties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lancerman Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 6 minutes ago, Forge said: Categorizing a team as a Dynasty is an interesting concept. I don't think it's enough to win something arbitrary like 3 out of 5. The Giants won 3 world series in 5 years, but I don't know many that categorize that team as a "Dynasty". The two years in between they missed the playoffs altogether, and some of those years they didn't even win their own division. It's different for each sport and the context of the era. In basketball you really aren't a dynasty unless you won about 5 in a given period of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas5737 Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 17 minutes ago, Heinz D. said: 45 minutes ago, Thomas5737 said: Or at least wait until they have consecutive winning seasons. To be a true Dynasty I'd say 3 in a row, a dynasty traditionally doesn't have an interruption. As far as sports dynasties it's whatever you want. Three what in a row? Division titles? You certainly don't mean Super Bowls? I mean the true origin of dynasty where a single person or family reined for a long period of time, there wasn't a 3 out of 5 year dynasty. Sports dynasties aren't defined, traditionally thinking, back to back is better than 3 out of 5 if there wasn't a repeat because you held the title for more than one year/term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heinz D. Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 11 minutes ago, ninjapirate said: and what would be the negative to that? Ehh, it's a descriptive term used only to measure up teams of a certain era or time frame, anyway. There wouldn't be a huge negative, but on the other hand, people are going to go out and declare this or that, regardless. It's a historical stamp. 1 minute ago, TENINCH said: Right now the NFC is too strong for any dynasties. You might be right about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted June 25, 2018 Share Posted June 25, 2018 48 minutes ago, Heinz D. said: I suppose. But if you don't approach it relatively, there may not really be "dynasties" any more, though. In the last 20 years which teams were a dynasty? Its pretty much NE and that’s it right?...by those standards it fits too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.