AlNFL19 Posted July 23, 2018 Share Posted July 23, 2018 Dang it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted July 23, 2018 Share Posted July 23, 2018 I mean.. maybe they can get someone to take a flyer on him for a conditional pick of him making the roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
August4th Posted July 23, 2018 Share Posted July 23, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaguarCrazy2832 Posted July 23, 2018 Share Posted July 23, 2018 1 minute ago, August4th said: Cant trade him if he cant pass a physical, no? Or cant get much for him at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MKnight82 Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 I was gonna knock this thread but there’s really nothing else to talk about right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSG Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 Trying to make room for Dez? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ET80 Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 Who is realistically going to give up anything for Mitchell? Guy is talented, but can't stay healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeanTaylorsaPIMP Posted July 24, 2018 Share Posted July 24, 2018 16 hours ago, MKnight82 said: I was gonna knock this thread but there’s really nothing else to talk about right now. I called Malcolm Mitchell an average WR on Twitter and Pats fans absolutely pounced at me ?. One guy (who I know does not represent most Pats fans) said that Mitchell would be the #1 WR on the Redskins haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlNFL19 Posted July 24, 2018 Author Share Posted July 24, 2018 1 hour ago, SeanTayorsaPIMP said: I called Malcolm Mitchell an average WR on Twitter and Pats fans absolutely pounced at me ?. One guy (who I know does not represent most Pats fans) said that Mitchell would be the #1 WR on the Redskins haha. I think Mitchell would be their No. 2 quite easily if he ever plays again. I think he's absolutely better than Paul Richardson. He's average now but he could become something if his career isn't over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSUeagles14 Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 1 hour ago, AlNFL19 said: I think Mitchell would be their No. 2 quite easily if he ever plays again. I think he's absolutely better than Paul Richardson. He's average now but he could become something if his career isn't over. what makes him better than richardson? ive spent my whole life in georgia/south carolina, and am kinda a fan of uga, so im rooting for mitchell. But theres a chance richardson can become a more well rounded wr. Theres pretty much no shot mitchell will ever become a good deep threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlNFL19 Posted July 25, 2018 Author Share Posted July 25, 2018 22 minutes ago, GSUeagles14 said: what makes him better than richardson? ive spent my whole life in georgia/south carolina, and am kinda a fan of uga, so im rooting for mitchell. But theres a chance richardson can become a more well rounded wr. Theres pretty much no shot mitchell will ever become a good deep threat. I think Mitchell is a better route-runner and has some of the strongest hands of any non-Pro Bowl receiver (also has 97th percentile hand size; Richardson is percentile 13). He's been able to develop trust with Tom Brady and is better at fighting for the ball. To me, Richardson is a deep threat specialist and slot receiver whereas Mitchell has No. 1 potential because of his consistency. In his first season, he was able to get open a lot and make some great plays on his touches. He might never be a deep threat, but I still think he's a better overall wide receiver. Mitchell is a bit slower, at 4.45 in the 40 to Richardson's 4.4, but both have similar profiles by the broad and vertical jump (average around 75th percentile each). Also, I'd rather have Mitchell because he's under contract for 2 years, about $1M to Richardson's 5-year, $40M deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSUeagles14 Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 22 minutes ago, AlNFL19 said: I think Mitchell is a better route-runner and has some of the strongest hands of any non-Pro Bowl receiver (also has 97th percentile hand size; Richardson is percentile 13). He's been able to develop trust with Tom Brady and is better at fighting for the ball. To me, Richardson is a deep threat specialist and slot receiver whereas Mitchell has No. 1 potential because of his consistency. In his first season, he was able to get open a lot and make some great plays on his touches. He might never be a deep threat, but I still think he's a better overall wide receiver. Mitchell is a bit slower, at 4.45 in the 40 to Richardson's 4.4, but both have similar profiles by the broad and vertical jump (average around 75th percentile each). Also, I'd rather have Mitchell because he's under contract for 2 years, about $1M to Richardson's 5-year, $40M deal. if you have to mention a specufic qb, you kinda are already wrong. contract is irrelevant and please provide 10 examples of each guy "fighting for the ball". if youre gonna critoque it i have to assume you have multiple examples at the ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlNFL19 Posted July 25, 2018 Author Share Posted July 25, 2018 52 minutes ago, GSUeagles14 said: if you have to mention a specufic qb, you kinda are already wrong. What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris00cm Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 It's a shame his knee is damaged goods. He had the makings to be a very good player at one time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSUeagles14 Posted July 25, 2018 Share Posted July 25, 2018 34 minutes ago, AlNFL19 said: What? what was confusing? you said mitchell was better and then used his chemistry with brady as a reason. even if thats the case (not really provable), its irrelevant to whose better. your whole argument for him has been crap tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.