Jump to content

Bears could be interested in trading too much for Khalil Mack


cooters22

Recommended Posts

"Most importantly, the $134 million extension is not going to give the Packers immediate salary cap relief. Rodgers was scheduled to account for $20.56 million on the Packers’ cap in 2018. His new projected cap hit is $20.9 million

Overall, the Packers added less than $400,000 to their cap in 2018 by extending Rodgers, who will account for only 11.8 percent of the Packers’ cap.

By the time Rodgers’ deal and the Brett Hundley trade are in the books, the Packers should be right around $11 million under the salary cap in 2018"

https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2018/08/30/how-aaron-rodgers-new-contract-affects-packers-salary-cap/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SilverNBlackFan said:

100 pages...wow. This has to happen now

It's like that Kevin Costner movie, Wyatt Earp Prince of Waterworld.  If we post it, it must be true.

 

Khalil Mack is now a Green Bay Packer.  The league might not recognize it, but everyone hates Goodell, right?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, deltarich87 said:

Past 100 pages and Mack isn't a Packer

Fire Gute, fire McCarthy and trade Rodgers before his extension cripples this team for years to come

It's Kizer time in GB

I heard a rumor that the Raiders/Packers are attempting to work out a deal for Mack

Raiders suggested two 1st round picks = Packers said no

Packers countered with a 1st round pick and Matthews = Raiders said no

Raiders countered with a 1st round pick and Kenny Clark = Packers said no

 

And they're continuing to see if they can work out some sort of agreement.

Also the Packers are checking the market to see what they could get for a couple of players including Matthews... which if they could get a 1st for him from some other team, then they might turn around and trade two 1st to the Raiders for Mack. But there are reportedly some other players other than just Matthews they're checking what they might get for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Beast said:

I heard a rumor that the Raiders/Packers are attempting to work out a deal for Mack

Raiders suggested two 1st round picks = Packers said no

Packers countered with a 1st round pick and Matthews = Raiders said no

Raiders countered with a 1st round pick and Kenny Clark = Packers said no

 

And they're continuing to see if they can work out some sort of agreement.

Also the Packers are checking the market to see what they could get for a couple of players including Matthews... which if they could get a 1st for him from some other team, then they might turn around and trade two 1st to the Raiders for Mack. But there are reportedly some other players other than just Matthews they're checking what they might get for them.

Not sure if serious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Beast said:

I heard a rumor that the Raiders/Packers are attempting to work out a deal for Mack

Raiders suggested two 1st round picks = Packers said no

Packers countered with a 1st round pick and Matthews = Raiders said no

Raiders countered with a 1st round pick and Kenny Clark = Packers said no

 

And they're continuing to see if they can work out some sort of agreement.

Also the Packers are checking the market to see what they could get for a couple of players including Matthews... which if they could get a 1st for him from some other team, then they might turn around and trade two 1st to the Raiders for Mack. But there are reportedly some other players other than just Matthews they're checking what they might get for them.

If serious, this is crazy intel. I would like to keep Matthews at this point but whatever works for Mack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Norm said:

Not sure if serious

I heard a rumor that we could be interested in Khalil Mack and it's possible we could get him on our team if we give something to his current team and then pay Mack a lot of money. Still trying to confirm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...