packfanfb Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 1 minute ago, Norm said: I just had some actually. Nothing happened. Must not have put enough butter on it. Try again tomorrow around 3:00pm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, jleisher said: Fair! However, if the Raiders want the two #1 picks and the Packers only want to give up one. To get a deal done, you have to offer something you normally wouldn't want to offer. That's why I'd give them the other 1st. If it was Daniels or the other 1st, that's an easy one for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad gluckman Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 2 minutes ago, thrILL! said: Mack ain’t trying to sign an extension with the Browns. LoL Why not? He wants the most money he can get (and he should) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrILL! Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 4 minutes ago, Brad gluckman said: Why not? He wants the most money he can get (and he should) He’s going to get paid out the wazoo either way. I highly doubt he’s going to want to spend the next 4-5 years not even sniffing .500 when he can take a little less and contend for Lombardi’s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinneasGage Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 up until that last rap tweet i've never even entertained this in my mind as being a legitimate thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Don't care much for La Canfora but I agree with him here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000957552/article/chances-of-khalil-mack-being-traded-very-real This story says several teams in contact and that the Packers are one of the teams connected without elaborating on a source for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad gluckman Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 19 minutes ago, thrILL! said: He’s going to get paid out the wazoo either way. I highly doubt he’s going to want to spend the next 4-5 years not even sniffing .500 when he can take a little less and contend for Lombardi’s. I guess it depends on the person. I dont know a lot about Mack. Some guys dont care about winning nearly as much as money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, Brad gluckman said: I guess it depends on the person. I dont know a lot about Mack. Some guys dont care about winning nearly as much as money. That's most / almost all ... when you're talking 100 million. You give me that type of money and I'll play for the Vikings, Lions or Bears. But I think they need to keep at least one 1st for next year, because it's looking like a great draft year. I would almost be more willing to give a 1st from a future year than next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 It's way too early to pin anything down, but we can toss out possibilities to compare. Probably a mute exercise because of the sentiment of this crowd but.... Jalen Jelks and Michael Deiter are guys we could come away with using our 2 first rounders without trading up (yea it's early). We could have both of them, and they would be 80 million dollars cheaper. Maybe get a Safety in the second round and that's quite a haul ---- and more importantly 3 starters on rookie deals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Guys, it's not happening. Now that there's a "robust" trade market for Mack, some team is just going to offer two firsts (next year and the following year) or a first and a 2nd. Trading Mack to a crappy team (top 10 pick), where he won't win any Super Bowls, is ALWAYS going to be better than trading him to a great team where it could go down as an embarrassing trade if he wins a Super Bowl. The Browns, Jets and a bunch of other teams make more sense for the Raiders than we do, and we're not going to get into a bidding war of draft picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 I really liked the Raiders 2 years ago as a fun, up and coming team....and now it's all gone in an instant. $100 million to Gruden. Brutal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deltarich87 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 27 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: Guys, it's not happening. Now that there's a "robust" trade market for Mack, some team is just going to offer two firsts (next year and the following year) or a first and a 2nd. Trading Mack to a crappy team (top 10 pick), where he won't win any Super Bowls, is ALWAYS going to be better than trading him to a great team where it could go down as an embarrassing trade if he wins a Super Bowl. The Browns, Jets and a bunch of other teams make more sense for the Raiders than we do, and we're not going to get into a bidding war of draft picks. Yep. Gruden's the guy running the show and he's got a comfy 10yr deal so I don't think he'd mind taking draft picks over multiple years rather than just having GB give them 2 1sts in 2019. If a team like the Browns or Jets are really serious about Mack, they stand to have a more appealing offer. Their 1st/2nd rd picks over the next few years will undoubtedly be more valuable than 2 late 1sts that GB can offer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrILL! Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 47 minutes ago, Brad gluckman said: I guess it depends on the person. I dont know a lot about Mack. Some guys dont care about winning nearly as much as money. That’s true. I just can’t remember a player of his caliber in his prime agreeing to be traded (or maybe even signing in FA) to the league’s worst/most embarrassing team before. 38 minutes ago, cannondale said: It's way too early to pin anything down, but we can toss out possibilities to compare. Probably a mute exercise because of the sentiment of this crowd but.... It is mind-bottling when the crowd is full of pre-madonnas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
persiandud Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 115 pages and going just to see Mack get traded to a team not named the Packers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.