Jump to content
cooters22

Bears could be interested in trading too much for Khalil Mack

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, cooters22 said:

Stud. Do you pick him with the first pick in fantasy football?

I don't think so. 2nd round maybe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Joe said:

I don't think so. 2nd round maybe.

What is your top five?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, cooters22 said:

What is your top five?

In no particular order:

Brees, Rodgers, Gurley, Matt Ryan, Zeke.

 

I think this is the year of the QB for fantasy as I see few RB's that are worth being your RB1 and I don't trust a lot of the stud WR's this year like Julio and AJ Green. I think Hopkins will have a better year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dallas Goedert *******

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dom capers special baby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I'm in the wrong thread. Ban me

 

Wait, I said that so we trade for Mack

Edited by Norm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love Mack. Not sure what I’d give for him. I’d be hesitant to give up more than a second due to the money ball aspect of the game. There is value in drafting a starter getting paid on a rookie deal 4-5 years. Mack at 20M+ a year would have to be a DPOY candidate to be worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, cooters22 said:

You are clearly missing the fact that Mack is one of best defensive players in football and Earl Thomas is just a good football player. Of the two, Mack has the potential to put you over the top. 

Earl Thomas isn't one of the best defensive players in football? heh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, pacman5252 said:

I love Mack. Not sure what I’d give for him. I’d be hesitant to give up more than a second due to the money ball aspect of the game. There is value in drafting a starter getting paid on a rookie deal 4-5 years. Mack at 20M+ a year would have to be a DPOY candidate to be worth it.

.....he is a DPOY candidate 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just have a hard time believing the Raiders wont find a way to keep him, they won't trade him for a pack of gum. Perhaps even 2 first round picks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gopackgonerd said:

I just have a hard time believing the Raiders wont find a way to keep him

Of course. They totally want him to be a Raider. Who wouldn't ?

But here we are.

Its only when you reach an impossible impasse that you consider deploying the BATNA option that your bean- counters conjured up. You take the asset and trade it for maximum remuneration, which gets you to your Big Picture goal of a playoff team.... when you arrive at the new stadium in Las Vegas

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_alternative_to_a_negotiated_agreement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this thread serious. Espn out here feeding other teams make believe and dreams. Mack aint going no where. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, persiandud said:

.....he is a DPOY candidate 

He is now, but will he be in 3 years, and what is the amount of guaranteed cash involved? The guy wants franchise QB money.

Here is the capologist moneyball logic;

If you hit on a second round pick (just a average starter, which is probably around a 60% bet), year 3 you have a guy with 2 years being in a plus contract situation (worth 7-8 conservatively, if hes a stud, could be much more) making 1.5M. Even if that second is just a backup, you are probably breaking even. If you completely whiff on a second round pick and you cut him year 3, you are out like 1M a year signing bonus. If you have enough guys on plus deals like this, you can always find a FA to bring in.

For Mack, for him to even just be worth it on a season by season basis, he'd need to put up 15 sacks a year and be in the DPOY conversation every year. He right now is talented enough, but factor in injuries, natural age regression, there is a decent percent chance (probably greater than 50%) he is not a top 5 pass rusher in 3 years. All of a sudden his contract is a huge liability (making 20M worth 5-10).

The analytics from a cap standpoint say trading for Mack would be really dumb.Let's not even get that he's a position player and probably only worth a point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, pacman5252 said:

I love Mack. Not sure what I’d give for him. I’d be hesitant to give up more than a second due to the money ball aspect of the game. There is value in drafting a starter getting paid on a rookie deal 4-5 years. Mack at 20M+ a year would have to be a DPOY candidate to be worth it.

Which he is. Already won it once. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×