Sasquatch Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Just now, packfanfb said: We're gonna hit 100 pages too fast... Only about 15 more posts! Should hit that by midnight or before at this rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fattlipp Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 bump to 100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 You were supposed to wait until Friday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uffdaswede Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 6 minutes ago, packfanfb said: We're gonna hit 100 pages too fast... It’s like curling! Stop sweeping! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 2 hours ago, packfanfb said: This is how it starts. Last week the talk was "Raiders aren't trading him at all." This week it's "well we will trade him for at least two 1st round picks." Asking price will probably go down once Week 1 gets here. How I picture everyone talking like he's going to be cheap or get cheaper lol Y'all should write some passionate Disney song about why you deserve to have him. Works in the movies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 2 hours ago, TheGreatZepp said: 1st and 3rd, I wouldn’t even blink for that asking price for Mack Nor would about any team with any money. That's why it's not real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWhitehurst Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 15 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: How is 2 first round draft picks conservative? how many teams even have 2 2019 first round draft picks? Answer: 1 team, green bay Given those two firsts will likely be no lower than pick 20, then I think that is a conservative offer for a player of Mack's caliber. But hey, not everyone here will agree on Mack's intrinsic value, let alone his relative value in terms of how much he would benefit the Packer's defense. (I think he instantly makes us a top 15 defense, if not top 10.) Having said that, given what cap space it may take to sign him, that may lessen his relative value to the Packers team as a whole over the course of his whole contract, especially if we did not win the Super Bowl this year with his services. If Gute manages to trade for and sign Mack, it is with the thought of trying to win it all now, this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
incognito_man Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 I can't decide if they'll announce it day of game (tomorrow) or day after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Sorry venting here... but I can't figure out for the life of me why people keep suggesting we can save a 1st round pick by trading the Raiders Cobb or Matthews instead? ... since when are their contracts worth 1st round picks after fans keep complaining their over paid. The Raiders don't want their own more talented over payed players so they'll gladly take ours? I just makes no sense to me. You give me a 1st for Cobb or Matthews, I might quickly take it... they're not worth a 1st round draft pick. 5 minutes ago, cannondale said: Like I said, feasibility has nothing to do with Oakland's asking price. The Packers are able to strike a deal for the rights to Mack. That's the easy part The impossible part that everyone conveniently ignores is Mack's asking price. He cripples the cap and his signing guarantees nothing I completely agree. I mean the Raiders clearly think his asking price is too high. If you trade two 1st round picks and get that huge cap number.... either You have a ton of cap space saved up Or you're putting yourself into cap hell in 3 or 4 years from now... which will require you to not resign guys OR not signed FAs... and basically you'll be rebuilding to a degree. This might be alright if you win a Super Bowl in the next two or three years, but you'll gonna feel a lot of hurt if you don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herbie_Hancock Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 Lmfao How did we get to 100? I feel like i looked on my lunch a couple hours ago and we were at 50 hahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herbie_Hancock Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 I wanna be the one to take it to 100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herbie_Hancock Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 SIGN JUSTIN GRIFFITH SIGN RANDY MOSS TRADE FOR STEVEN JACKSON BRING BACK BRETT I feel like those topics are the most important the last 10 years on here haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 1 hour ago, cannondale said: Well the negotiations probably start at 4/100 with 80 million guaranteed. Make that work in our team building structure. Everyone has a plan on how to trade for him, but no one has the plan on how to sign him, and still function as a team moving forward when guys like Clark, Daniels and Bahk want new deals. I guess we just let all those guys walk ? We'll trade for other people to replace those guys. We have lots of picks and they never work out. Gute isn't Ted. He uses ALL avenues!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted August 30, 2018 Share Posted August 30, 2018 29 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: How is 2 first round draft picks conservative? how many teams even have 2 2019 first round draft picks? Answer: 1 team, green bay There's no requirement to be the same year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.