Broncofan Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 8 hours ago, thebestever6 said: Sam Darnold and a Hazmat suit for Lock and a First make the call Elway. IR players can be traded. NY hangs up on us. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKRNA Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 Nice to see Barrett putting up the numbers for TB. 3 sacks, 3 TFL and 4 QB hits just today. The NFL sack leader after two weeks. He keeps that up and he'll sign a monster deal after the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
champ11 Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 12 hours ago, AKRNA said: Nice to see Barrett putting up the numbers for TB. 3 sacks, 3 TFL and 4 QB hits just today. The NFL sack leader after two weeks. He keeps that up and he'll sign a monster deal after the season. What was the reasoning for us not bringing him back? I guess it seemed like it was mutual since he would have been a reserve. Good for Shaq Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKRNA Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 17 minutes ago, champ11 said: What was the reasoning for us not bringing him back? I guess it seemed like it was mutual since he would have been a reserve. Good for Shaq Probably couldn't afford even the $3 mil per year is a part of it. Also he deserved a starting gig and wouldn't get it here. He's only on a one year contract with TB. Thats a great starting front 7 TB's put together. Barrett should feast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iLikeDefense Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 Anyone think saints would take a flier on flacco even though they have teddy B? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-mac Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 25 minutes ago, iLikeDefense said: Anyone think saints would take a flier on flacco even though they have teddy B? Why on earth would we want to trade Flacco? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iLikeDefense Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, paul-mac said: Why on earth would we want to trade Flacco? Why wouldn’t we? Tank baby. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-mac Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 53 minutes ago, iLikeDefense said: Why wouldn’t we? Tank baby. We only just traded for him, and frankly, through two games he's looked better than any QB we've had since Manning retired. Furthermore, our rookie Drew Lock is out until midseason. If we were winless and Lock's healthy at the trade deadline then I understand it, but this team isn't tanking and has no feasible alternative to Flacco at the moment. He's not going to be traded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebestever6 Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 18 minutes ago, paul-mac said: We only just traded for him, and frankly, through two games he's looked better than any QB we've had since Manning retired. Furthermore, our rookie Drew Lock is out until midseason. If we were winless and Lock's healthy at the trade deadline then I understand it, but this team isn't tanking and has no feasible alternative to Flacco at the moment. He's not going to be traded. Steelers is a lot more interesting of a convo. If Mason Rudolph doesn't deliver in the next few weeks. We may just get that 2020 second round draft pick everyone coveted around draft time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, thebestever6 said: Steelers is a lot more interesting of a convo. If Mason Rudolph doesn't deliver in the next few weeks. We may just get that 2020 second round draft pick everyone coveted around draft time. At 0-2 if Mason Rudolph doesn’t deliver in the next few weeks then the Steeelers are done. Picture them like us in 2020 if we lost Flacco - we’d ride or die with Lock. We wouldn’t pay for a stopgap vet. Edited September 16, 2019 by Broncofan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, champ11 said: What was the reasoning for us not bringing him back? I guess it seemed like it was mutual since he would have been a reserve. Good for Shaq He wanted to start and get paid either on a multi year deal or have a big year and get paid next offseason. TAM offered him the chance to start. We never had a chance. I can’t fault the FO here. Edited September 16, 2019 by Broncofan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul-mac Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 1 hour ago, thebestever6 said: Steelers is a lot more interesting of a convo. If Mason Rudolph doesn't deliver in the next few weeks. We may just get that 2020 second round draft pick everyone coveted around draft time. We only paid a 4th for him, there’s no way we’re getting a 2nd from anyone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebestever6 Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, paul-mac said: We only paid a 4th for him, there’s no way we’re getting a 2nd from anyone. 16 minutes ago, Broncofan said: At 0-2 if Mason Rudolph doesn’t deliver in the next few weeks then the Steeelers are done. Picture them like us in 2020 if we lost Flacco - we’d ride or die with Lock. We wouldn’t pay for a stopgap vet. Totally understand that I was being a little sarcastic. Realistically, a gm and head coach have to be both on the hottest of seats to warrant any type of over pay. Carolina, Houston with minimal or extremely raw backup support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iLikeDefense Posted September 16, 2019 Share Posted September 16, 2019 2 hours ago, paul-mac said: We only just traded for him, and frankly, through two games he's looked better than any QB we've had since Manning retired. Furthermore, our rookie Drew Lock is out until midseason. If we were winless and Lock's healthy at the trade deadline then I understand it, but this team isn't tanking and has no feasible alternative to Flacco at the moment. He's not going to be traded. I’d rather lose every game till we get lock back then win one or two with Flacco. Maybe get a top 5 pick? That would be well worth it. But you’re right, our FO will hold on to Flacco thinking we’ll win games. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broncofan Posted September 17, 2019 Share Posted September 17, 2019 (edited) Well we clearly whiffed on letting Siemian go. Now the Jets QB.... For less than a half. (Seriously don’t know how he walked away from that late hit. Looked like his leg pretzel’d). Edited September 17, 2019 by Broncofan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.