Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
pnies20

Khalil Mack

Recommended Posts

I’m optimistic that we get a deal done. I think Grudens dumb benough to let him walk. 

Will it take our first? Maybe less because of contract demands? Will Mack be open to signing a contract here?

CLE: Khalil Mack

OAK: Emmanuel Ogbah, 2019 2nd, 2019 3rd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd see if Ogbah and a 1st would do it. I think that it would take at least that, if not another 3rd-6th round selection.

Also, I'd do that in a heartbeat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just can’t see us giving up our first. Dorsey ain’t doin that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Garrett is who we think he is can we pay two ends $20+ million each?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, pnies20 said:

I just can’t see us giving up our first. Dorsey ain’t doin that.

If Dorsey is too dumb to give up a 1st for a guy who is arguably the most disruptive force in the NFL (aside from perhaps Donald) at only 27 years of age for a probable mid tier 1st rounder who is more likely to be an average NFL starter, than he's dumber than he looks, which is saying something. The Raiders aren't taking less than at least a 1st and a proven quality player as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pnies20 said:

I just can’t see us giving up our first. Dorsey ain’t doin that.

Then he's probably not getting Khalil Mack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Thomas5737 said:

If Garrett is who we think he is can we pay two ends $20+ million each?

Mack will most likely be on the decline and gone once garrett gets to his next deal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ReggieCamp said:

Then he's probably not getting Khalil Mack.

But... WHAT IF????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, sdrawkcab321 said:

Mack will most likely be on the decline and gone once garrett gets to his next deal. 

So 3 years max for Mack being here? Probably not worth giving up all that much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They’ve asked for “at least two 1s”.

Usually that means you can strike a deal for something a bit less than that, but if we can find ground and sign him to a long term deal, we really need to make a move.

Our drafting is basically a shot in the dark at best, anyway.

If we use some of those picks to get the DPOY, I’m absolutely cool with that.

Myles Garrett and Khalil Mack?

That’s the fastest route to the playoffs and more that we have available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Thomas5737 said:

So 3 years max for Mack being here? Probably not worth giving up all that much.

I’d say 4-5 years. We will pick up Garrett’s 5th year option and after that franchise him. And we’d still have plenty of money left over since we still won’t have a QB to pay big money to since baker will still be on his rookie deal, hopefully. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, sdrawkcab321 said:

I’d say 4-5 years. We will pick up Garrett’s 5th year option and after that franchise him. And we’d still have plenty of money left over since we still won’t have a QB to pay big money to since baker will still be on his rookie deal, hopefully. 

Well the franchise tag will still probably be close to 20 with the average of the top 3 at that position. You also have a chance at angering Garrett. I wouldn't be opposed to Mack but I think you have to look at future financial plans very carefully and make his contract movable after 3 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Thomas5737 said:

Well the franchise tag will still probably be close to 20 with the average of the top 3 at that position. You also have a chance at angering Garrett. I wouldn't be opposed to Mack but I think you have to look at future financial plans very carefully and make his contract movable after 3 years.

I don’t think you should worry about 5 years down the line. That’s an eternity in football years. You can turn a team around in 2 years. Look at the eagles. So the window if very short. I’d give up a first for a chance to compete for 4-5 years. Plus we will have a lot of other guys off the books by now and the cap will be much higher than it is now. 

Edited by sdrawkcab321

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d personally rather keep our 1sts for awhile until we’re a Mack away from contending. I’d prefer to go LT or if there’s none worthy one of the stud d-linemen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



×