Art_Vandalay Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 I don't hate the move for the Raiders assuming they were well compensated. I like it for both sides. When you're in the same division as A-A-Ron, you need a guy like Mack. I think the Raiders will suck, but not necessarily because of this move. I just don't think Gruden's going to be a good coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INbengalfan Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Imagine being a Raiders fan and waking up to this crap. It's still not 6 am on the left coast. Great for the Bears. I hoipe, for raiders fans sake, they do something worthwhile with the picks. And I wonder ewho the player is. Would they really throw Floyd, another first rounder, in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 4 minutes ago, ramssuperbowl99 said: Would have been far cheaper for the Bears to trade for Gregg Williams in that case tbh. Lol truth. Again I'm not saying that's going to happen and certainly not hoping for it. My point was an over-exaggerated example of Mack's ability to change the terrain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Bears already had 40 sacks last year with the 14th DVOA defense. I don't know if they're going to trade a defensive piece away, but that sack total is going to increase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packerraymond Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 2 minutes ago, wwhickok said: Let me hit you with a hypothetical that I truly hope doesn't come to pass. Khalil Mack comes around the edge untouched and nails Aaron Rodgers. He ends up holding a clipboard for multiple weeks. Still like GB's offense better? Do you see where I'm going with this? Khalil Mack is a dangerous and legitimate game changer. GB gets the nod offensively, but i don't think GB's defense gets the nod. Khalil Mack gives the Bears an untamed ability to completely disrupt these power house offenses you're talking about. David Bahktiari laughs at this scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 1 minute ago, ACO said: Mack on the Packers would have just been ridiculous. I can see why they would be hesitant to give up 2 firsts though. Especially after making Godgers the highest paid player ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 1 minute ago, ACO said: Mack on the Packers would have just been ridiculous. I can see why they would be hesitant to give up 2 firsts though. At least it would have been two firsts in one year. Spread out over two years I think would give teams pause more so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INbengalfan Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 3 minutes ago, PapaShogun said: Apparently the Packers, Bills, and Browns also made strong pushes. Chicago was the only team willing to part with two firsts. But could the Pack really be close? They already gave up next year's first to move up in April for the DE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Any word on the compensation yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob_shadows Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Just now, INbengalfan said: But could the Pack really be close? They already gave up next year's first to move up in April for the DE Uhh... Aren't you thinking of the saints? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TecmoSuperJoe Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Just now, INbengalfan said: But could the Pack really be close? They already gave up next year's first to move up in April for the DE Don't the Packers have two first round picks in 2019? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramssuperbowl99 Posted September 1, 2018 Author Share Posted September 1, 2018 Just now, wwhickok said: Lol truth. Again I'm not saying that's going to happen and certainly not hoping for it. My point was an over-exaggerated example of Mack's ability to change the terrain. To actually respond, your logic throughout the thread has been circular. "If the Bears win the SB, they won this trade" "If Mack injures the other team's best player, then the impact makes the trade worth it." Neither of those are likely scenarios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VigilantZombie Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 5 minutes ago, Packerraymond said: David Bahktiari laughs at this scenario. Mack is gonna get to Rodgers, maybe not every time, but it's going to happen, regardless of who that LT is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts4313 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 1 minute ago, bucsfan333 said: they trade him and hope their new draft picks can come close to the impact that Mack has in games. They hope the two 1st rounders + the player they got + the 3-4 more players they are going to be able to sign will be able to make that impact. ~7 starters/role players vs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INbengalfan Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Just now, rob_shadows said: Uhh... Aren't you thinking of the saints? Crap. Yes. My bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.