TankWilliams Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 This is all an elaborate revenge by Gruden against the Raiders for trading him the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted September 1, 2018 Author Share Posted September 1, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Sweet... save 20 mil by trading Carr now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apparition Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 1 minute ago, DawgX said: Who thought that? People on this very forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAF-N72EX Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 This is why you don't bring dinosaurs out of retirement regardless of their past resume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucsfan333 Posted September 1, 2018 Author Share Posted September 1, 2018 Just now, big_palooka said: Sweet... save 20 mil by trading Carr now. He could get hurt. Don't wanna put all your eggs in one basket. With the saved cash, you could have five or six QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forge Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 A fifth? Wow.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 1 minute ago, Starless said: People on this very forum. Hue Jackson had a 2 and 3 ready to go for him at the deadline, which was more than Jimmy G was traded for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFM18 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Legit question, but he wasn't on the bubble of being cut by the Bills was he? Were the Bills going with all 3 or would he or Peterman have been cut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WMDman Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Just now, PFM18 said: Legit question, but he wasn't on the bubble of being cut by the Bills was he? Were the Bills going with all 3 or would he or Peterman have been cut? we were apparently gonna keep all 3 but AJ was clearly on the outside looking in for the starting job Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 2 minutes ago, PFM18 said: Legit question, but he wasn't on the bubble of being cut by the Bills was he? Were the Bills going with all 3 or would he or Peterman have been cut? Yes. He was virtually certain to be cut. He was the clear QB3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFM18 Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Cheers for the responses. Makes sense as much as most Gruden business at the moment then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daineraider Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 14 minutes ago, Jakuvious said: Good replacement for Mack. Haha, yes, this eases our pain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMountainGoat Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 I could understand it if it was a conditional 7th, it saves you competing for him. But a 5th? That's a usable draft pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 Not even going to make a new thread for it but.... This is just getting ridiculous for Raider fans now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.png.f40f9543097d7c33ae4ad1ba4b0e906b.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.