Mr Anonymous Posted December 31, 2018 Share Posted December 31, 2018 8 hours ago, TheOnlyThing said: Spot on. Not one I'm happy to be right about. Doesn't even seem bold now. What a long, ugly season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyecatcher Posted January 2, 2019 Author Share Posted January 2, 2019 On 9/6/2018 at 3:17 PM, Arthur Penske said: Fackrell having 6+ sacks like some have predicted would be huge. That said, doubt it happens. Oops Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted January 2, 2019 Share Posted January 2, 2019 3 minutes ago, eyecatcher said: Oops He did, but it wasn't that huge for the defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyecatcher Posted January 2, 2019 Author Share Posted January 2, 2019 Just now, Arthur Penske said: He did, but it wasn't that huge for the defense. It wasn't his fault it wasn't that huge. He had 2 less sacks than Mack and 2 more tackles for loss than Mack for a fraction of the cost. Mack played in 71% of the snaps for Chicago while Fack played 58% for Green Bay. I wasn't ripping on you though. I don't think anyone here really thought he'd get to double digit sacks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.