Leader Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Just now, PossibleCabbage said: I still don't get why media people have Josh Jacobs so high. Sure, he's a good RB... and I guess it's okay to take RBs high now, but he's not exactly special. My take on the list is its driven by talent evaluation - not potential draft slot. Apparently, somebody thinks Jacobs is pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gopackgo247 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 bored at work so i ripped off this little draft. i dont hate it. 12: R1P12 EDGE BRIAN BURNS FLORIDA STATE 30: R1P30 TE T.J. HOCKENSON IOWA 44: R2P12 LB DEVIN BUSH MICHIGAN 75: R3P11 S JOHNATHAN ABRAM MISSISSIPPI STATE 114: R4P12 EDGE JALEN JELKS OREGON 118: R4P16 OT WYATT MILLER UCF 150: R5P12 TE CALEB WILSON UCLA 185: R6P12 RB BRYCE LOVE STANFORD 194: R6P21 WR JAKOBI MEYERS NC STATE 226: R7P12 S JOJO MCINTOSH WASHINGTON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smetana34 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 26 minutes ago, SSG said: That's almost a dream scenario with 2 QBs and a WR going in the top 10. I honestly believe three will go Top 10. Denver is in love with Lock. And Washington is rumored to be in the market too. They may look to jump Denver should Murray and Haskins both go early Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 22 minutes ago, Leader said: My take on the list is its driven by talent evaluation - not potential draft slot. But like the thing I do not understand is- why is Jacobs better at being a running back than Greedy Williams is at being a cornerback (a more valuable position)? Like how do we account for positional value here? Michael Dickson was the best punter a lot of people ever scouted last year but nobody was putting him in the top 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smetana34 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 23 minutes ago, PossibleCabbage said: I still don't get why media people have Josh Jacobs so high. Sure, he's a good RB... and I guess it's okay to take RBs high now, but he's not exactly special. The guys does everything at a very high level. The only thing he lacks is homerun hitting ability, but even at that, he's not slow and perfectly capable of ripping off huge runs. He's phenomenal as a pass blocker and receiver, making him a plug and play 3-down back immediately for whatever team takes him. If the board doesn't fall right for them, I could see Baltimore, Philly, or KC scooping him at the end of the 1st. I wouldn't mind him at #44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Packer_ESP Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 hour ago, Fl0nkerton said: or Oliver. Thing is, if we don't go EDGE at 12 it's almost a certainty that all the ones we're drooling about will be gone by 30. Unless you're OK with grabbing Winovich / Allen later (or maybe Polite), it's probably better to go EDGE at 12 and then try to nab one of the lesser hyped DTs later. 30/44 will probably have enough on the board to get two of TE, OL, S or DT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fl0nkerton Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 minute ago, Packer_ESP said: Thing is, if we don't go EDGE at 12 it's almost a certainty that all the ones we're drooling about will be gone by 30. Unless you're OK with grabbing Winovich / Allen later (or maybe Polite), it's probably better to go EDGE at 12 and then try to nab one of the lesser hyped DTs later. 30/44 will probably have enough on the board to get two of TE, OL, S or DT True. Not super impressed with any of the Edges after Burns/Ferguson honestly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PossibleCabbage Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 10 minutes ago, Packer_ESP said: Thing is, if we don't go EDGE at 12 it's almost a certainty that all the ones we're drooling about will be gone by 30. Unless you're OK with grabbing Winovich / Allen later (or maybe Polite), it's probably better to go EDGE at 12 and then try to nab one of the lesser hyped DTs later. 30/44 will probably have enough on the board to get two of TE, OL, S or DT I think Ed Oliver (and Devin White) are your fallback options if 5-6 Edges go before 12 and you can't trade back, but probably aren't preferred over a guy like Burns or Sweat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kepler Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 hour ago, gopackgo247 said: if this is how it goes down, are we grabbing Burns? I would run my blazing 7.22 40 to the podium for Burns if it shook out like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 23 hours ago, n8ghee said: I got a real strong gut feeling after watching Jace Sternberger (spelling?) tape that he could be a packer target. Sounds like the type of seam guy MLF talks about liking at TE. Jace is probably my best "value" TE in this year's class. Get him in the 3rd and I'll be pleased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 22 hours ago, SSG said: Is it though? That's 2 top 5-15 talents in a lot of drafts. Next years IDL class isn't going to hold a candle to this year's and Daniels time as a Packer is coming to an end sooner rather than later. Probably not ideal for next year but that's a ton of value for a DC who loves his IDL. Drafting 2 DL that high is pretty much putting the writing on the wall that Adams is a bust and that Mike Daniels is gone after next year. I'm still skeptical that the Packers will re-sign Daniels, but I'm not ready to write off Adams. The only guy that is guaranteed a roster spot in 2020 is Kenny Clark. If Simmons is still sitting there in the 3rd round (and I don't think he will be), I'm pulling the trigger on him. But anything earlier than that and I'm out. We need at least 2 EDGE, 2 S, and probably an OL or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 16 hours ago, PossibleCabbage said: Strikes me as pretty close to ideal, if you land a free agent safety. Swap Devin Bush out for someone else. Real meh on any of the Round 3 prospects on aside from Nelson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 hour ago, smetana34 said: I honestly believe three will go Top 10. Denver is in love with Lock. And Washington is rumored to be in the market too. They may look to jump Denver should Murray and Haskins both go early Denver just traded for Joe Flacco, and they had the opportunity to take Josh Rosen last year and chose Bradley Chubb instead. I think they're one of the teams that are content passing up on a potential QB if they don't love his fit. Washington and Miami are the two most obvious suitors for QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 FYI Gutey on the combine, draft, and a bit of the current' team: https://www.packers.com/video/total-packers-1-on-1-with-brian-gutekunst Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 McShay has us taking Hock at 12, and Burns at 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.