HighCalebR Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 1 hour ago, Victor1124 said: From what i understand, Dillard seems like a LT only type player and lacks the physicality to play RT. I know some people who don't even love him at LT. I don't think RT is as much of a need as most here and definitely would prefer to stay away from Dillard, especially at 12. I disagree with this sentiment. Lack of reps doesnt equate inability. Dillard is a 4 of 5 guy to me. I think he has the most important responsibility down, pro. Projecting, I think his hand placement and his footwork will serve him well in the zone run game. When he gets out on screens hes looking for work and can move those second level guys with a swing. His drive skills in power are a huge question mark, but the pad level he plays with gives me hope theres enough there to work with. Theres not enough evidence pro or con for me there. I'd be thrilled with Dillard if Oliver and Burns aren't there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 Always interesting if you can manage to just take everything FWIW http://walterfootball.com/draft2019bustsdefense.php http://walterfootball.com/draft2019bustsoffense.php http://walterfootball.com/draft2019valuesoffense.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrettFavre004 Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 BF004’s Big Value Awesome Board https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1X4M6JAoBmT-9SVNWnvpJDum3TkF7wRW3yVQDvib140Q/edit?usp=sharing All you need for draft weekend!!! Be sure to let me know how horrible my rankings are. I find it way more awesome perusing through the board if you let this play in the background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannondale Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 When the magic is happening in the bedroom - that's the music I have blaring through the 14 speakers ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 6 hours ago, incognito_man said: Is a starting OT as much of a need as we think? Is Bulaga worth a 3rd contract? Ideally Bulaga's body is better this year than last year after a full offseason of NOT recovering from ACL surgery and he sticks at RT for a 3rd contract, right? Bulaga is gone after this contract, I'll go ahead and guarantee it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 5 hours ago, deathstar said: I think that 3 tackles go in the top 11 picks. Unless you're including defensive tackles in that grouping, that isn't going to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathstar Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 5 minutes ago, CWood21 said: Unless you're including defensive tackles in that grouping, that isn't going to happen. Okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 Andy Herman: When I say Hockenson is rich at 12 this is really the primary reason. I love Hock but it’s basically just really tough to justify the use of that resource on a TE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 Zach Kruse: If Ed (Oliver) and Hock are both there at 12, they honestly should take Ed (Oliver) then trade up to 13 to get Hock. T.J. Hockenson is such a perfect blend of talent, versatility and scheme fit at a need position for the Packers. Jimmy and Lewis will be gone after this year. Then there’s nothing. And this offense needs TEs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheech Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 How high up could the Packers move from 30 if they, say, offered to swap 2nd round picks and threw in a 4th? 25? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 17 minutes ago, Cheech said: How high up could the Packers move from 30 if they, say, offered to swap 2nd round picks and threw in a 4th? 25? If the point charts are correct we could get to 22. That would be interesting because I could see Brian Burns sitting there at 22 with a tackle and Fant. So depending on what we did at 12 we'd be sitting pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squire12 Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 14 minutes ago, Cheech said: How high up could the Packers move from 30 if they, say, offered to swap 2nd round picks and threw in a 4th? 25? Would need a team with a similar slot in second round. Hou at 23 could work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 18 minutes ago, Golfman said: If the point charts are correct we could get to 22. That would be interesting because I could see Brian Burns sitting there at 22 with a tackle and Fant. So depending on what we did at 12 we'd be sitting pretty good. You might want to take your glasses off and clean those lens cause we're taking Burns at 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 11 minutes ago, Leader said: You might want to take your glasses off and clean those lens cause we're taking Burns at 12 NOT-GONNA-HAPPEN, at 12. He's not worthy of the 12 pick IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilprin Posted April 20, 2019 Share Posted April 20, 2019 I am good with Hock, Fant, Sternberger, or Smith Jr...just seems it will need to be in the first 3 picks. My preference is Fant, then Hock, Sternberger and Smith Jr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.