JBURGE Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, Ragnar Danneskjold said: Vikings had 2 timeouts left, Packers had 0 Thank you So we were looking at, if we ran 3 plays with no fumbles, punting the ball with about 47 seconds left (assuming 10 seconds to run 2 running plays with timeouts, and then a full 40 seconds to take the delay of game penalty to punt on 4th. So after the punt, appx 40 seconds with no timeouts and starting at appx their 20. They need a TD and 2 point conversion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 25 minutes ago, JBURGE said: Thank you So we were looking at, if we ran 3 plays with no fumbles, punting the ball with about 47 seconds left (assuming 10 seconds to run 2 running plays with timeouts, and then a full 40 seconds to take the delay of game penalty to punt on 4th. So after the punt, appx 40 seconds with no timeouts and starting at appx their 20. They need a TD and 2 point conversion. No wait a minute. We were ahead 29-21 at the time of Alex's "reversed" INT. 1st & 10 at MIN 25 (1:45 - 4th) (Shotgun) K.Cousins pass short right intended for S.Coley INTERCEPTED by J.Alexander at MIN 23. J.Alexander to MIN 18 for 5 yards (G.Iloka). PENALTY on GB-C.Matthews, Roughing the Passer, 15 yards, enforced at MIN 25 - No Play. The key component of the above is GB would have had the ball at the MN 18 with 1:30+ left and an 8 point lead. So - I dont care how many TO's MN had. We piss away some period of time - kick a gimme FG - and the game is ours. So - the INT was the dagger. Instead - MN got the ball back - went down for the TD+2 that tied the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 1 minute ago, Leader said: No wait a minute. We were ahead 29-21 at the time of Alex's "reversed" INT. 1st & 10 at MIN 25 (1:45 - 4th) (Shotgun) K.Cousins pass short right intended for S.Coley INTERCEPTED by J.Alexander at MIN 23. J.Alexander to MIN 18 for 5 yards (G.Iloka). PENALTY on GB-C.Matthews, Roughing the Passer, 15 yards, enforced at MIN 25 - No Play. The key component of the above is GB would have had the ball at the MN 18 with 1:30+ left and an 8 point lead. So - I dont care how many TO's MN had. We piss away some period of time - kick a gimme FG - and the game is ours. So - the INT was the dagger. Instead - MN got the ball back - went down for the TD+2 that tied the game. No we wouldn't, the above is incorrect. The INT was on our 18 yard line - Kirk bombed it - and Jaire did not return because he was down by contact when he caught it. So we would have had the ball on our side of the field with what I said being accurate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, JBURGE said: No we wouldn't, the above is incorrect. The INT was on our 18 yard line - Kirk bombed it - and Jaire did not return because he was down by contact when he caught it. So we would have had the ball on our side of the field with what I said being accurate Really? ESPN must really be slipping then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBURGE Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 6 minutes ago, Leader said: 7 minutes ago, JBURGE said: No we wouldn't, the above is incorrect. The INT was on our 18 yard line - Kirk bombed it - and Jaire did not return because he was down by contact when he caught it. So we would have had the ball on our side of the field with what I said being accurate Really? ESPN must really be slipping then. Yeah, 100%. It was a deep throw. I can't view videos at work on youtube so I can't find the highlight for you, but in the game highlights it will be in there towards the end. That is a really bad play description lmao Edit: Just watched the play on my phone, Jaire caught it at about the Packers 26. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 5 minutes ago, JBURGE said: Yeah, 100%. It was a deep throw. I can't view videos at work on youtube so I can't find the highlight for you, but in the game highlights it will be in there towards the end. That is a really bad play description lmao. Edit: Just watched the play on my phone, Jaire caught it at about the Packers 26. Well I guess the data input folks weren't spared when ESPN cut back for budget reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pugger Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 On 10/2/2018 at 11:57 AM, Leader said: Man, we sure have had a couple of calls go against us that never should have over the past few years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.