Xmad Posted October 19, 2018 Share Posted October 19, 2018 1 hour ago, ET80 said: Thought the Panthers were already sold? Because that's the only way he gets back onto the court... I'm thinking of the chargers whoops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaiphoon Posted October 22, 2018 Share Posted October 22, 2018 Yeah, if my memory serves me, Jack Kent Cooke had to sell the Clippers when he got the Redskins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigInBoys Posted October 22, 2018 Author Share Posted October 22, 2018 Just to clarify, the rule meant that if you owned an NFL team in city A, you could not own another professional sports team in city B if city B ALSO had an NFL team. I believe the reasoning for this was so that NFL owners wouldn't be competing for the same sports dollars through franchises in other sports/leagues. Why change it now I'm not specifically sure why, other than that the NFL/pro sports is a different animal then it was when the rule was devised and owners probably want more flexibility to own more sports teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.