rcon14 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 35 minutes ago, vegas492 said: I think Barrett is going to be a nice value in free agency. If given first team reps, I think he is going to surprise everyone with what he can do. But, that is just a gut feeling based on me watching him play a few times. He's sudden enough and he plays with some violence/physicality. And...he's just 26. There are good years ahead of him. Shaq Barrett's athletic scores fwiw: Power 17th percentile, Speed 40 58th percentile, Agility 90th percentile, Speed 10 35th percentile, Twitch 44th percentile. Pretty bendy/shifty guy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shanedorf Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 59 minutes ago, vegas492 said: I've always liked Robert Quinn. He can win fast. He gave the Packers OTs some trouble over the years He's still relatively young at 28 yrs, has some length at 6'4 and he's a 3rd contract guy - so there's a chance $$ won't be the only decider for his next home Career Earnings: $60,487,615 https://overthecap.com/player/robert-quinn/1343/ https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/Q/QuinRo00.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: Read this on Wilkerson wanting to come back to GB, but it sounds like that injury was worse than I thought. Wonder how effective he can be in 2019. https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2019/02/13/muhammad-wilkerson-highly-interested-in-return-to-packers-in-2019/ I think if you can bring him back for cheap money, maybe 3-4 mil, it's worth a look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthur Penske Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 29 minutes ago, {Family Ghost} said: I think if you can bring him back for cheap money, maybe 3-4 mil, it's worth a look. If so, I'd go less than that. Paid him ~5 mil last year and he's coming off a potentially career ending injury from the sound of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 45 minutes ago, rcon14 said: Shaq Barrett's athletic scores fwiw: Power 17th percentile, Speed 40 58th percentile, Agility 90th percentile, Speed 10 35th percentile, Twitch 44th percentile. Pretty bendy/shifty guy. Can you post Quinn's scores? Please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
{Family Ghost} Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 10 minutes ago, Arthur Penske said: If so, I'd go less than that. Paid him ~5 mil last year and he's coming off a potentially career ending injury from the sound of it. Yeah .. something with a small base and a load of incentives. He's the kind of guy that has had motivational issues in the past, so some incentives might help push him a little. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcon14 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Just now, vegas492 said: Can you post Quinn's scores? Please? Robert Quinn: Power: 67th percentile Speed 40: 90th percentile Agility: 68th percentile Speed 10: 34th percentile Twitch: 51st percentile Speed-to-power guy with enough bend to have some rush versatility. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas492 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, rcon14 said: Robert Quinn: Power: 67th percentile Speed 40: 90th percentile Agility: 68th percentile Speed 10: 34th percentile Twitch: 51st percentile Speed-to-power guy with enough bend to have some rush versatility. You dah man. Thank you! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CWood21 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 17 hours ago, KManX89 said: Texans cut Demaryius Thomas. Every wideout not named Devante Adams struggled last year. Do we make a splash for him? Coming off a torn Achilles? Not a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chili Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 I've seen Cole Beasley name popping up a few times but this FA move makes little sense to me. Why would we spend a small fortune on the slot position when Rodgers clearly does not utilise it enough. We made that mistake giving Cobb the money and so why would we repeat that mistake again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victor1124 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 4 hours ago, vegas492 said: I think Barrett is going to be a nice value in free agency. If given first team reps, I think he is going to surprise everyone with what he can do. But, that is just a gut feeling based on me watching him play a few times. He's sudden enough and he plays with some violence/physicality. And...he's just 26. There are good years ahead of him. Barrett is the guy i really want. He has a good mix of bend, physicality, and motor. Living in KC, I got to watch the Broncos the multiple times a year and even in the limited playing time he got, he usually jumped out to me. Him being 26 in nice and possibility that he could be affordable makes it even better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcon14 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 17 minutes ago, Chili said: I've seen Cole Beasley name popping up a few times but this FA move makes little sense to me. Why would we spend a small fortune on the slot position when Rodgers clearly does not utilise it enough. We made that mistake giving Cobb the money and so why would we repeat that mistake again? GB has never valued tiny slot guys. Randall Cobb is like the smallest WR GB has drafted in like 25 years. We're not going to target Beasley or (insert tiny little slot WR here). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PACKRULE Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 39 minutes ago, rcon14 said: GB has never valued tiny slot guys. Randall Cobb is like the smallest WR GB has drafted in like 25 years. We're not going to target Beasley or (insert tiny little slot WR here). Yeah we could keep Cobb if we wanted to a likely a similar price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
packfanfb Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 4 hours ago, Chili said: I've seen Cole Beasley name popping up a few times but this FA move makes little sense to me. Why would we spend a small fortune on the slot position when Rodgers clearly does not utilise it enough. We made that mistake giving Cobb the money and so why would we repeat that mistake again? Beasley willl cost maybe half of what we were paying Cobb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PACKRULE Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 20 minutes ago, packfanfb said: Beasley willl cost maybe half of what we were paying Cobb. Cobb will be cheaper moving forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.