Jump to content
bkobow05

Will Aaron Rodgers throw 400 TD before 100 INT

Recommended Posts

ztoa    0
6 minutes ago, squire12 said:

I am not looking for the evidence you need to provide.

No, the throws were on the safe side of WR, so no chance of being intercepted.

Of course sometimes the throws are perfect.

like the throw to Jared Cook against Cowboys, it was not a perfect throw.

Watch for yourself.

Edited by ztoa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
squire12    29
Just now, ztoa said:

No, the throws were on the safence side of WR, so no chance of being intercepted.

Of course sometimes the throws are perfect.

Why are you asking the QB to make a throw that has a high chance of being intercepted?  The goal of making a pass is to limit the opportunity for the defense to make a play on the ball.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JBURGE25    32
2 minutes ago, squire12 said:
4 minutes ago, ztoa said:

No, the throws were on the safence side of WR, so no chance of being intercepted.

Of course sometimes the throws are perfect.

Why are you asking the QB to make a throw that has a high chance of being intercepted?  The goal of making a pass is to limit the opportunity for the defense to make a play on the ball.  

Because that's greatness apparently. You are judged on the corner's ability to make a play on an intercept-able ball

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ztoa    0
39 minutes ago, squire12 said:

Why are you asking the QB to make a throw that has a high chance of being intercepted?  The goal of making a pass is to limit the opportunity for the defense to make a play on the ball.  

 

Man, that is whole point.

He doesn't take risk ( so comes the great QBR). If Packers had won 14 games, that would be understandable. But that is not the case.

So either Rodgers didn't force the balls EVEN when he had to, or he simply could make the throws when he was running, or he couldnt make things happen when he was limited to the pockets.

Which scenario do you prefer?

Edited by ztoa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
squire12    29
8 minutes ago, ztoa said:

Man, that is whole point.

He doesn't take risk ( so comes the great QBR). If Packers had won 14 games, that would be understandable. But that is not the case.

So either Rodgers didn't force the balls EVEN when he had to, or he simply could make the throws when he was running, or he couldnt make things happen when he was limited to the pockets.

Which scenario do you prefer?

So in the examples you provided of Brady taking no risk is meant to show what?   

You seem to expect Rodgers to take risk and Brady to not yet compare them on an even barometer.  

I get that you think Brady is better than Rodgers in all facets, you fail to see that they are equal in many and Rodgers has the upper hand in some as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ztoa    0

This is unbelievable.

Brady doesn't take risk unless he has to. So does Rodgers.

When you have to take risk, it is simply impossible to have that kind of TD/Int ratio.

So it is either Rodgers doesn't take the risk EVEN when he has to, or he knows he won't be able to make the throws like he is in pockets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
blkwdw13    6

Can they last six or so pages of this thread just get delete, this debate between one guy and everyone else is just stupid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
squire12    29

You are making an assumption in that the videos provided were not risks because the throws were not able to be intercepted.  That speaks to the accuracy of the throws and the talent that Rodgers has while throwing on the move, being pulled down in the pocket.  

Maybe you can provide an example when Rodgers should have taken the risk of throwing an interception to back up the argument you are trying to make.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
squire12    29
1 minute ago, blkwdw13 said:

Can they last six or so pages of this thread just get delete, this debate between one guy and everyone else is just stupid. 

Sorry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
blkwdw13    6
2 minutes ago, squire12 said:

Sorry

It's not you guys, I can't believe you guys have put up with his debate if that's what you call a debate for this long. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
squire12    29
1 minute ago, blkwdw13 said:

It's not you guys, I can't believe you guys have put up with his debate if that's what you call a debate for this long. 

The objective has been moved enough times, I am not sure what the claim is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EliteTexan80    248
10 minutes ago, blkwdw13 said:

Can they last six or so pages of this thread just get delete, this debate between one guy and everyone else is just stupid. 

I'll go one better and lock the topic. Seems like every page eventually devolves into posting about posters, so no need to continue. 

I'd prefer it if people kept it to football moving forward. 

- ET

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×