ThatJerkDave Posted November 8, 2019 Share Posted November 8, 2019 6 hours ago, BayRaider said: - 1st Round Rookie Clelin Ferrell had two very clutch timed sacks, five pressures, and two ball swats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacman5252 Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 1 tackle today I’ll take the cap space and draft picks that turned into Savage, the Smiths, and Gary over that 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneTwoSixFive Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 On 08/11/2019 at 2:54 PM, ThatJerkDave said: On 08/11/2019 at 8:41 AM, BayRaider said: - 1st Round Rookie Clelin Ferrell had two very clutch timed sacks, five pressures, and two ball swats My two favourite targets in the 2019 draft, Jeffery Simmons and Clelin Ferrell. Even though i liked Ferrell a lot, I was surprised he went as early as #4 overall. Preferred him to Burns and Sweat, though they were both well liked on this board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatJerkDave Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 58 minutes ago, OneTwoSixFive said: My two favourite targets in the 2019 draft, Jeffery Simmons and Clelin Ferrell. Even though i liked Ferrell a lot, I was surprised he went as early as #4 overall. Preferred him to Burns and Sweat, though they were both well liked on this board. I was a Burns guy all the way. Probably Sweat second, but I also really liked Josh Allen, but didn't think he would make it to 12, and he didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 16, 2019 Author Share Posted December 16, 2019 For the record I did NOT bump this thread. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Anybody venture over to the Bears forum to see what they are saying about the game? Doubt they would ever second guess the Mack trade but he was mostly invisible today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Golfman said: Anybody venture over to the Bears forum to see what they are saying about the game? Doubt they would ever second guess the Mack trade but he was mostly invisible today. You would guess wrong. That's literally the most recent page of the Game Thread. Edited December 16, 2019 by AlexGreen#20 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, AlexGreen#20 said: You would guess wrong. What did this guy say about Mack deal because it shows nothing. Nevermind: I went and read it! LOL, cut him next year! hahahaha! Edited December 16, 2019 by Golfman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexGreen#20 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Golfman said: What did this guy say about Mack deal because it shows nothing. 22 minutes ago, Heinz D. said: No, you got that right, brother. NOT GREAT. I'm all for tweaking things to see if he regains form next season. But his wallet is clearly weighing him down. He should have been benched weeks ago. If this nonsense continues into next season, he should be traded or cut. The Mack trade is shaping up to be one of the worst in NFL history. Agree on both ends. I think it's going to take some public outrage by coaches to get something done. We'll see who has the gumption to do it. Edited December 16, 2019 by AlexGreen#20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 16, 2019 Author Share Posted December 16, 2019 Lol. Dafreak is saying they win by 6 if not for the Patterson penalty. That man talked a LOT of **** leading up to this season and just can't hack that he was wrong. I would love to troll the hell out of him right now and I hope he somehow sees this. Because his team sucks, they're gonna continue to suck, he was wrong about Mack, we're 11-3 with a first round draft pick and 21 million, 28 million, 34 million under the cap limit after we cut Graham and Taylor. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 1 minute ago, Outpost31 said: Lol. Dafreak is saying they win by 6 if not for the Patterson penalty. That man talked a LOT of **** leading up to this season and just can't hack that he was wrong. I would love to troll the hell out of him right now and I hope he somehow sees this. Because his team sucks, they're gonna continue to suck, he was wrong about Mack, we're 11-3 with a first round draft pick and 21 million, 28 million, 34 million under the cap limit after we cut Graham and Taylor. I think they think they've seen enough from Trubisky to roll with him next year. They might even opt in on the 5th year option on him too. Seriously wonder if they keep Hicks around. He's a beast but wrong side of 30! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacman5252 Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, Golfman said: I think they think they've seen enough from Trubisky to roll with him next year. They might even opt in on the 5th year option on him too. Seriously wonder if they keep Hicks around. He's a beast but wrong side of 30! They kind of have to roll with Mitch in 2020. They are capped out and are light on draft capital (2 2s... no 1,3,4). Unless they can convince Philip Rivers to come to Chi, the options are kind of rough...trade a future 1 again, Teddy Bridgewater, or take a flyer on Winston or Mariota. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golfman Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Just now, pacman5252 said: They kind of have to roll with Mitch in 2020. They are capped out and are light on draft capital (2 2s... no 1,3,4). Unless they can convince Philip Rivers to come to Chi, the options are kind of rough...trade a future 1 again, Teddy Bridgewater, or take a flyer on Winston or Mariota. How about Tannehill? Not sure Tennessee gives him a franchise tag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leader Posted December 16, 2019 Share Posted December 16, 2019 Hasn't this trade been figured out yet? I mean...its not like the facts surrounding it have changed a whole helluva lot. Doesnt it seem kinda set in stone by now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted December 16, 2019 Author Share Posted December 16, 2019 14 minutes ago, Leader said: Hasn't this trade been figured out yet? I mean...its not like the facts surrounding it have changed a whole helluva lot. Doesnt it seem kinda set in stone by now? No, because I was told by everyone I was stupid for saying it was a bad trade just like I was told it was stupid for the Vikings to trade for that one white Chiefs defensive end that I think was named Jared Allen that everyone said was elite and I’m already forgetting his name. I’m going to keep reminding people because NFL fans are just too stupid to get the concept that there are two things every team needs to build a Super Bowl roster: 1. Cap health. 2. Draft capital. Trading away both for one player has never worked and will never work if you want to win Super Bowls. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.