M.10.E Posted August 22, 2017 Author Share Posted August 22, 2017 2 hours ago, JTagg7754 said: Why would anyone still have baggage w/ Miami? They haven't really been relevant in 15 years. It's not really anyone "hating" Miami as it is a typical fanboy overrating their players. His response certainly makes it seem like people still do. Please tell me how we are overrating our players when neutral sources agree with us? I'm not trying to tell you an outlandish fact. I'm telling you our RB/WR who put up great numbers last year are going to be really good. They are arguably top 10 in the nation at their respective position. I don't mind say you don't think they are top 10, but when you are condescending in your response it requires some jabs back. Edit: Oh, look: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2727788-ranking-the-top-100-college-football-players-for-the-2017-season another one to support our "overrating" of players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 You just cited Bleacher Report as a source. Neat. I can find a handful of sources to "validate" any point I'm trying to make. Try finding one more reputable. That's like saying "see I told you my guy is a first rounder!! Walter Football said so!!!" C'mon man, you gotta do better w/ your sources. Any bum can write for BR. Hell, I used to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M.10.E Posted August 22, 2017 Author Share Posted August 22, 2017 Dude, I googled top RB college football 2017 and got whatever popped up. I wasn't going to spend more than 30 minutes trying to convince a couple of random condescending dudes. I've provided more evidence of neutral parties than either of you guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyPhil1781 Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 46 minutes ago, M.10.E said: Dude, I googled top RB college football 2017 and got whatever popped up. I wasn't going to spend more than 30 minutes trying to convince a couple of random condescending dudes. I've provided more evidence of neutral parties than either of you guys. My search results (in the order in which they appear): Not top 10: http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/news/top-25-running-backs-2017-saquon-barkley-derrius-guice-bo-scarbrough-kamryn-pettway-nick-chubb/enbsk85d9mip1qt8h5sugjojj Not top 10: https://campusinsiders.com/news/top-returning-running-backs-college-football-2017-02-10-2017/ Not top 10: http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/233090604/college-football-running-back-player-rankings Not top 10: http://www.nfl.com/photoessays/0ap3000000818671 So there's the first four I found. Something tells me you just happened to stumble across one and say "SEE!! SEE!! I TOLD YOU HE'S TOP 10!!". Sorry man, just accept it and move on..... Would you like me to get more though? Are the first four sites I visited (since they apparently could be written by a grandma who's never seen a game and you wouldn't care) not enough for you? I'm positive there's more...... much more than you could find. This isn't being condescending; it's giving you factual info. Not my fault how you accept said info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.