Jump to content

Free ain't free in the NFL...


vike daddy

Recommended Posts

With Murray going to the Saints apparently Mark Ingram is out, I would not mind him as another RB here.  Not sure what his price would be though, I assume it is way more than what little Murray got for going to the Saints.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Torchezim said:

Can't say that I expected the Vikings to go all out this Free Agency period but man..

 

They probably won't be going all out for the next several years.  They already have 39 players tied up for 2020 and extensions may/will probably be worked on for Thielen, Cook, and Elflein (if he improves this year)...and the major FAs next year (and will need to make decisions on) are Anthony Harris, Mackensie Alexander, Stephen Weatherly and David Morgan.  Waynes, if not traded, will likely walk.  And of course, there will be Cousins...which will depend on he performs this year.  

Edited by swede700
Link to comment
Share on other sites

clearly they don't need OL at all......or continue to under value the need.....or think somehow new coaches can fix this mess, along with a mid round draft pick or two.

Or kicker, apparently. But at least this good, but not dominant D is sort of intact from last year.

Edited by PrplChilPill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PrplChilPill said:

clearly they don't need OL at all......or continue to under value the need.....or think somehow new coaches can fix this mess, along with a mid round draft pick or two.

Or kicker, apparently. But at least this good, but not dominant D is sort of intact from last year.

You know the draft hasn't happened yet, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, PrplChilPill said:

clearly they don't need OL at all......or continue to under value the need.....or think somehow new coaches can fix this mess, along with a mid round draft pick or two.

Or kicker, apparently. But at least this good, but not dominant D is sort of intact from last year.

If that is referencing not going after Cann, who was bottom 3 in pressures, I'll pass. Otherwise, it seems we'd have to give up over $10m to get someone and MN chose to spend that money on Barr.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vikingsrule said:

If that is referencing not going after Cann, who was bottom 3 in pressures, I'll pass. Otherwise, it seems we'd have to give up over $10m to get someone and MN chose to spend that money on Barr.

It was about not signing anyone for the OL. And yes, I know that money went to Barr.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...