MacReady Posted February 12, 2019 Author Share Posted February 12, 2019 Yeah, as long as you don't step on a square that has been stepped on or run into somebody else, you're fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted February 12, 2019 Author Share Posted February 12, 2019 Also, I'm thinking about making a MASSIVE game like Monster Melee/Conflict Critters. Something that would be continuous. It would be like a huge RPG that would have locations to attack and hold forts that Effect defense, non-playable characters and villains and monsters that can attack during certain scenarios. There'd be a big map and some goal and endgame scenarios, but you could die, new players could join, lots of things like that. No host would necessary, and you'd just need a quorum of X amount of players present to perform Chatty rolls. Might work on that in my spare time. Something like Game of Thrones or something. EDIT: Have like 7 players start the game and be Kings of certain areas. Then have the ability to recruit heroes to their side. Heroes can rise in rank to become knights, dukes, and maybe kings themselves. Each starting character would have a land with its own advantages and disadvantages. Have preset character and land types that effect Chatty rolls. Then have preset hero types. You can recruit a certain amount of heroes to play for you, but heroes could always change allegiances. Players could make treaties with other kings, kings could betray deals, etc. It would be massive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazgul Posted February 12, 2019 Share Posted February 12, 2019 41 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: Also, I'm thinking about making a MASSIVE game like Monster Melee/Conflict Critters. Something that would be continuous. It would be like a huge RPG that would have locations to attack and hold forts that Effect defense, non-playable characters and villains and monsters that can attack during certain scenarios. There'd be a big map and some goal and endgame scenarios, but you could die, new players could join, lots of things like that. No host would necessary, and you'd just need a quorum of X amount of players present to perform Chatty rolls. Might work on that in my spare time. Something like Game of Thrones or something. EDIT: Have like 7 players start the game and be Kings of certain areas. Then have the ability to recruit heroes to their side. Heroes can rise in rank to become knights, dukes, and maybe kings themselves. Each starting character would have a land with its own advantages and disadvantages. Have preset character and land types that effect Chatty rolls. Then have preset hero types. You can recruit a certain amount of heroes to play for you, but heroes could always change allegiances. Players could make treaties with other kings, kings could betray deals, etc. It would be massive. King Naz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted February 12, 2019 Author Share Posted February 12, 2019 2 hours ago, Nazgul said: King Naz. No. I would write new characters. Mixing characters from other movies is stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazgul Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 3 hours ago, Outpost31 said: No. I would write new characters. Mixing characters from other movies is stupid. Game sounds stupid. I'm out. King Naz or riot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, Nazgul said: Game sounds stupid. I'm out. King Naz or riot. this guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted February 13, 2019 Author Share Posted February 13, 2019 29 minutes ago, Nazgul said: Game sounds stupid. I'm out. King Naz or riot. Don't need you anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazgul Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 43 minutes ago, Outpost31 said: Don't need you anyway. Every game needs me. Don't fool yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted February 13, 2019 Author Share Posted February 13, 2019 Just @Malfatron left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Submitted. I don't much time today, so fairly sure I bombed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted February 14, 2019 Author Share Posted February 14, 2019 Chatty http://us25.[spam].com/71521558341220 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 On 2/12/2019 at 10:09 AM, Outpost31 said: You HAVE to be available and not be the one everyone is waiting for. It's one thing for players to be waiting on players, but you should not have to wait for the host. Therefore, make all deadlines at a time when you know you can read the results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacReady Posted February 14, 2019 Author Share Posted February 14, 2019 Just now, Malfatron said: I was working on the results. Lol. B - BCB M - Malf T - Ted R - Ragnarok. Snaking order or not would not have mattered. One player clearly picked the best path. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malfatron Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 congrats @Ragnarok Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragnarok Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Malfatron said: congrats @Ragnarok I highly doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.