Jump to content
naptownskinsfan

NFL owners unhappy with Redskins, call Allen "literally, a joke"

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, lavar703 said:
1 hour ago, naptownskinsfan said:

No, it's just a list of teams that cant turn it down if they are asked to do it.  The qualifications to turn down Hard Knocks are as follows:

1) They have a first-year head coach in place 
2) They have a playoff berth in the past two seasons 
3) They have appeared on Hard Knocks in the past 10 years

 

What I’m saying is they want every team to do it at least once. There’s five teams that qualify this year and we’re one of them. Had we fired Gruden we wouldn’t be eligible. 

No, what they want is every bad team to do it at least once.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/6/2019 at 1:02 AM, naptownskinsfan said:

This guy gets it.  

Well, you don't want good teams do it for a few reasons:

  1. The good teams don't want to do it because they want to keep their edge/not lose any trade secrets. It also helps to see what not to do/scare players into "well, you don't want to go there, do you?" Mystique and mystery help the top.
  2. The mediocre teams don't want to the good teams to do it because they want other franchises to be the laughing stock and not have their respective fanbases asking questions "well, look the Patriots have been successful for forever, and they do X, why aren't we?" Always easier to sell "well, at least we aren't Y (*)!"
  3. The front office doesn't want it because there is probably the perception there would be no drama (I disagree because those interesting bubble players are always going to make for stories). Metaphorical car wrecks sell; workman, professional play doesn't. Again, I disagree but that's just me.

So, you're left with the bottom feeders. In order to make it interesting, you need to rotate it a bit so it's not all bottom feeders.

 

(*) The Redskins are now part of group Y.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/5/2019 at 10:55 PM, mar29020 said:

i think its clear snyder doesnt care about winning

True. He cares about making money.

Of course, a winning product would make more money, but he's an model example of being rich =/= being intelligent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Woz said:

True. He cares about making money.

Of course, a winning product would make more money, but he's an model example of being rich =/= being intelligent.

We just need one scandal. Just one...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Thaiphoon said:

We just need one scandal. Just one...

I think in this day and age, it would need to be a pretty big one ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Woz said:

I think in this day and age, it would need to be a pretty big one ...

Well...something like the Jerry Richardson one. Didn't that get the owners to force him to sell?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Thaiphoon said:

Well...something like the Jerry Richardson one. Didn't that get the owners to force him to sell?

I now know why y’all are Mods!!!!! You two speak of many wisdoms!!!!! But would the scandal be that bad with the redskins PR they could turn just about anything into a nightmare!!! We need to ponder this up like the grinch before Christmas this needs to happen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, ripsean21 said:

I now know why y’all are Mods!!!!! You two speak of many wisdoms!!!!! But would the scandal be that bad with the redskins PR they could turn just about anything into a nightmare!!! We need to ponder this up like the grinch before Christmas this needs to happen

Hmmm...that is a good question. I think that they could only control it internally. If it were as bad as the Richardson one, they could not control any external firestorm. And given that the fans want Danny gone, they would help fan the flames (at least I would)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Thaiphoon said:

Hmmm...that is a good question. I think that they could only control it internally. If it were as bad as the Richardson one, they could not control any external firestorm. And given that the fans want Danny gone, they would help fan the flames (at least I would)

You would need video evidence. The NFL does nothing unless they can see it (or have it shown to them via TMZ)

a0a55a6d380a1c59ba7ab5ff45490c43.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Woz said:

You would need video evidence. The NFL does nothing unless they can see it (or have it shown to them via TMZ)

a0a55a6d380a1c59ba7ab5ff45490c43.jpg

I think I can arrange "video evidence"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Thaiphoon said:

I think I can arrange "video evidence"

Then I think perhaps we can be in business

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Woz said:

Then I think perhaps we can be in business

If I pull this off, when you speak of me, speak of me well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Thaiphoon said:

If I pull this off, when you speak of me, speak of me well.

Fare the well ... just remember, mod privileges don't come with bail money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×