big_palooka Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Chali21 said: Another thing: the Chargers had both Brees and Rivers the last 20 years and have zero championships to show for it. Terrible ownership. Cheap, never wants to pay coaches. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agarcia34 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 Thinking back at those Chargers teams and the talent they had. Amazing how they didn't win a Super Bowl. Those Chargers teams were stacked. I will never forget the image of LT sitting on the bench in that playoff game. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 He's been looking for a contract for a while and is underpaid. Apparently he has health issues and is 28, but has been a very solid CB for the Skins when on the field. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OG_C2X Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Raider Cody posted an article that the bears were shopping Mack 2 1sts and 2 nds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCOUGHMAN Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 2 hours ago, OG_C2X said: Raider Cody posted an article that the bears were shopping Mack 2 1sts and 2 nds. My buddy told me that today I thought he was just playing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimkelly02 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 So Mack’s performance dips and hes 2 years older but his trade value has increased by 2 2nds? Yeah he’s not getting traded, no ones giving that up. In fact, the Bears overpaid for him when you factor in the cost of his contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chali21 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 50 minutes ago, jimkelly02 said: So Mack’s performance dips and hes 2 years older but his trade value has increased by 2 2nds? Yeah he’s not getting traded, no ones giving that up. In fact, the Bears overpaid for him when you factor in the cost of his contract. They gotta fix the offense, they wiffed on the QB position by passing on two of the better QBs in the league. If they had Mahomes they probably would have won a super bowl or 2. It’s a shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitty 2.0 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Chali21 said: They gotta fix the offense, they wiffed on the QB position by passing on two of the better QBs in the league. If they had Mahomes they probably would have won a super bowl or 2. It’s a shame. I think a lot of NFL teams are going to go the way of the titans. Bruising running attack and a great defense. The NFL is overrun with smaller cover type LB’s and are vulnerable to a bigger back. That’s why I’m worried about drafting Queen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oakdb36 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 (edited) The rumor about Mack doesn't make sense. His dead cap would be 45M. He can't be traded. Edited February 11, 2020 by oakdb36 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 The Mack rumor is pure BS. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dante9876 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 1 hour ago, oakdb36 said: The rumor about Mack doesn't make sense. His dead cap would be 45M. He can't be traded. It's a dumb rumor. Based off nothing. But raider nation will run with it. It makes our trade look even better and makes the "traitor" Mack looks worse. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ Raider Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 The guy who started it tweeted a bunch of baseless rumors on Friday. Dude has zero credibility 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_palooka Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Perfect compliment to Josh if you're signing a vet. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaidersAreOne Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 I'm so down for Freeman. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimkelly02 Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 23 hours ago, Bitty 2.0 said: I think a lot of NFL teams are going to go the way of the titans. Bruising running attack and a great defense. The NFL is overrun with smaller cover type LB’s and are vulnerable to a bigger back. That’s why I’m worried about drafting Queen. Very valid concern. Queen at MLB would bring problems with stopping the run. He’d make some splash plays shooting gaps but he’s going to struggle getting off blocks when run at. He’d have to have 2 big, 2 gapping DT’s in front of him to keep linemen off him. Personally I think he’s far better suited as a WILL then MLB. I also think taking him at #19 is a reach. I’d much, much, much rather give up to 2 3rds to move up to #8 (Arizona) for Simmons. I think that’s a realistic trade option if Giants pass on him at 4 (I see Carolina going D. Brown). Arizona could still have their choice of Lamb or Jeudy if they want a WR or Wirfs, Wills, Thomas, or Bechton (1 would likely go to NYG at #4). I’d love to see passing downs with Simmons and Abram at LB with Joyner and Joseph at safety. I almost, almost think if we can’t get Schobert or Littleton we’d still be decent at LB. Simmons at SAM, Whitehead (hopefully restructured/reduced cap number) at MLB and M.Lee (who i still have some hope for, don’t forget his ‘18 pre-season was very good) or a cheap free agent. Whiteheads horrible covering TE’s and slot WRs but he’s capable of dropping into a zone. He’d only be in on base sets, which are around 40% of the time. Simmons can man up and erase the TE. It’s far from ideal but we wouldn’t be crippled by our LB play like we were this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts